"Clippy is famous for being one of the worst user interfaces ever deployed to the mass public. He stopped users to ask them if they needed help with basic tasks, like writing a letter or making a spreadsheet. As the Microsoft employee Chris Pratley has written, Clippy was “optimized for first use”: amusing the first time you encountered him, and frustrating after that. He was a puppet who only knew one script and kept repeating it, at you, throughout the workday.
He was also the product, I learned this week, of a male-dominated design process."
He was also the product, I learned this week, of a male-dominated design process."
There was another article, long time back, that went into the actual history of clippy's development. It was meant to be a standalone product but got most of it's features hacked and cut to fit in as part of Office Word. I got the impression from that article that the original work behind clippy was good but it was hamstrung by marketing and managers wanting it to be something else. Must see if I can find it.
I'm never sure what to make though of the last point. Is the argument that men shouldn't design UI (that women are naturally better designers)? Or is that engineers, because of their technical focus aren't designers? And writing software is a very different field to safety belt design from 1930s. Or is that an all-woman or mixed team wouldn't have made the same mistakes back then but surely there is a chance such teams would make different UI mistakes too?Jun 29, 2015
Leering? seriously? I can't even.Jun 29, 2015
Clippy won over Microsoft Bob?Jun 30, 2015
Add a comment...