I respectfully disagree. Unfortunately, these acts were specifically in response to wikileaks getting cutoff from visa, PayPal, & MasterCard. Although it is wrong to attack these companies, it shows that people are willing to stand up to these major companies controlling the flow of money around the world. Does no one else find it troubling that companies can refuse service against legal entities? The blocking of funds to wikileaks shows that these companies collaborated to help the American government silence an inconvenient voice. A voice that has the goal of "bringing important news and information to the public..." Private companies with that power SHOULD be unacceptable. The reasoning behind these companies blocking funds was because they were pressured by the State Department. It's unfortunate that these "kids, the largest generation on earth today, Millennias" are the ones trying to keep governments accountable for their actions. Overall, I believe the man was wrong in his act.... But it seems it was a response for a real cause that obviously no one cares much about.