Profile

Cover photo
Brian Oxley
Works at ThoughtWorks
Attended Rice University
Lives in Houston, TX
359 followers|698,730 views
AboutPostsPhotosVideos+1'sReviews

Stream

Brian Oxley

Shared publicly  - 
1

Brian Oxley

Shared publicly  - 
 
Primordial soup.
Surprisingly, smaller particles colliding with large nuclei appear to produce tiny droplets of quark-gluon plasma. Recent results show that the tiny droplets behave like a liquid not the expected gas. The results support the case that these small particles produce tiny drops of the primordial soup.
1

Brian Oxley

Shared publicly  - 
 
 
Black Holes Tell No Tales. Or Do They?

You’ve just committed the perfect crime. No one saw you do the crime, and you left no trace. The perfect crime. The only way anyone could prove you did it is by finding the journal of your master plan. Get rid of the journal, and you are scot free. You want to be absolutely, 100% certain that the information it contains is permanently destroyed. Suppose you toss your journal into a black hole. Would that destroy all traces of your plan?

The answer to this hypothetical scenario lies at the heart of the information paradox. Stated more generally, the paradox raises the question: can information be destroyed? The question is important because it strikes at the very heart of what science is. Through science we develop theories about how the universe works. These theories describe certain aspects of the universe. In other words they contain information about the universe. Our theories are not perfect, but as we learn more about the universe, we develop better theories, which contain more and more accurate information about the universe. Presumably the universe is driven by a set of ultimate physical laws, and if we can figure out what those are, then we could in principle know everything there is to know about the universe. If this is true, then anything that happens in the universe contains a particular amount of information. For example, the motion of the Earth around the Sun depends on their masses, the distance between them, their gravitational attraction, and so on. All of that information tells us what the Earth and Sun are doing.

In the last century, it’s become clear that information is at the heart of reality. For example, the second law of thermodynamics. In its simplest form it can be summarized as “heat flows from hot objects to cold objects”. But the law is more useful when it is expressed in terms of entropy. In this way it is stated as “the entropy of a system can never decrease.” Many people interpret entropy as the level of disorder in a system, or the unusable part of a system. But entropy is really about the level of information you need to describe a system. An ordered system (say, marbles evenly spaced in a grid) is easy to describe because the objects have simple relations to each other. On the other hand, a disordered system (marbles randomly scattered) take more information to describe, because there isn’t a simple pattern to them. So when the second law says that entropy can never decrease, it is saying that the physical information of a system cannot decrease. What began as a theory of heat has become a theory about information.

Is Information Conserved?

It’s generally thought that information can’t be destroyed because of some basic physical principles. The first is a principle known as determinism. If you throw a baseball in a particular direction at a particular speed, you can figure out where it’s going to land. Just determine the initial speed and direction of the ball, then use the laws of physics to predict what its motion will be. The ball doesn’t have any choice in the matter. Once it leaves your hand it will land in a particular spot. Its motion is determined by the physical laws of the universe. Everything in the universe is driven by these physical laws, so if we have an accurate description of what is happening right now, we can always predict what will happen later. The future is determined by the present.

The second principle is known as reversibility. Given the speed and direction of the ball as it hits the ground, we can use physics to trace its motion backwards to know where it came from. By observing the ball now, we can know from where the ball was thrown. The same applies for everything in the universe. By observing the universe today we can know what happened billions of years ago. The present is predicated by the past.

These two principles are just a precise way of saying the universe is predictable, but it also means information must be conserved. If the state of the present universe is determined by the past, then the past must have contained all the information of the present universe. Likewise, if the future is determined by the present, then the present must contain all the information of the future universe. If the universe is predictable, then information must be conserved.

Now you might be wondering about quantum mechanics. All that weird physics about atoms and such. Isn’t the point of quantum mechanics that things aren’t predictable? Not quite. In quantum mechanics, individual outcomes might not be predictable, but the odds of those outcomes are predictable. It’s kind of like a casino. They don’t know which particular players will win or lose, but they know very precisely what percentage will lose, so the casino will always make money. The baseball example was one of classical, everyday determinism. To include quantum mechanics we need a more general, probabilistic determinism known as quantum determinism, but the result is still the same. Information is conserved.

So what about black holes?

At first glance it would seem that black holes destroy information. If you toss an object into a black hole, the object (and all its physical information) is lost forever. It is as if the information of the object was erased, which would violate the basic principle that information cannot be destroyed. Now you might argue that being trapped is not the same thing as being destroyed, but for information it is. If you cannot recover the information, then it has been destroyed. So it would seem that black holes “eat” information, even though the laws of physics say that shouldn’t be possible. This is known as the black hole information paradox.

But it turns out things are actually more subtle. In general relativity, once a black hole forms it exists forever. If more matter is thrown into it, it can grow larger, but it never goes away. This is important, because if black holes live forever they don’t actually destroy information. Since time is relative things get a bit strange. For example, if you were to toss your crime journal into a black hole, how long would it take to reach the event horizon? From the journal’s perspective, it will cross the event horizon and enter the black hole in a finite amount of time, but from the outside observer’s view the event horizon is never reached. Instead the journal appears to get ever closer at an ever slower pace. Any outside observer will see the time of the falling journal get slower and slower as the black hole warps spacetime more and more. From the outside it appears that the journal never quite enters the black hole, and so its information is never lost.

But suppose we took an object and compressed it into a black hole.  According to general relativity, a black hole has three measurable properties: mass, rotation (angular momentum), and charge. That’s it. If you know those three things, you know all there is to know about the black hole. So a black hole is much simpler than other massive objects such as planets, stars and the like. It would therefore seem to have less information. If you think about an object like the Sun, it has a certain chemical composition, and it’s giving off light with different wavelengths having varying intensities. There are sunspots, solar flares, convection flows that create granules, and the list goes on. The Sun is a deeply complex object that we have yet to fully understand. The Sun contains a tremendous amount of information. And yet, if our Sun were compressed into a black hole, all that information would be reduced to mass, rotation and charge. All that information is lost forever.

But perhaps information can be saved by quantum theory. In the 1970s Stephen Hawking showed that one of the consequences of quantum theory is that black holes cannot hold matter forever. Instead, black holes can leak mass in the form of light and particles through a process known as Hawking radiation. While Stephen Hawking’s clever bit of mathematics describing this effect is pretty straightforward, interpreting the mechanism is less clear. One way of looking at it is that the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (which gives quantum theory its fuzzy behavior) means that virtual quantum particles can briefly appear in the vacuum of space, then then quickly disappear. In the normal, everyday world, these particles average out to zero, so we never notice them. But near the event horizon of a black hole, some of these virtual particles could cross the event horizon before disappearing, which decreases the mass (energy) of the black hole and allows other virtual particles to become “real” and radiate energy away. Another view is that the inherent fuzziness of quantum particles means you can never be absolutely certain that it is inside the event horizon. Although a particle cannot escape the black hole by crossing the event horizon, it could find itself outside the black hole through a kind of quantum tunneling.

Since a “quantum” black hole emits heat and light, it therefore has a temperature. This means black holes are subject to the laws of thermodynamics. Integrating general relativity, quantum mechanics and thermodynamics into a comprehensive description of black holes is quite complicated, but the basic properties can be expressed as a fairly simple set of rules known as black hole thermodynamics. Essentially these are the laws of thermodynamics re-expressed in terms of properties of black holes. As with regular thermodynamics, the entropy of a black hole system cannot decrease. One consequence of this is that when two black holes merge, the surface area of the merged event horizon must be greater than the surface areas of the original black holes. But remember that thermodynamics and entropy are a way to describe the information of a system. Because black holes have entropy, they also contain information beyond the simple mass, rotation, charge. Perhaps the information isn’t destroyed after all!

Unfortunately there’s a snag. Just like any quantum process, Hawking radiation is probabilistically determined. But it’s determined by the basic properties of the black hole. According to Hawking’s original theory, when a black hole evaporates, it evaporates into a random mix of light and matter. Not just “kind of” random, like tossing a dice, but truly random. This eliminates any possibility of recovering information from a black hole. So it would seem Hawking radiation also destroys information.

But several people have looked at modifications to Hawking’s model that would allow information to escape. For example, because Hawking’s quantum particles appear in pairs, they are “entangled” (connected in a quantum way). Perhaps you can used this quantum connection to give the information a way to escape. It turns out that to allow Hawking radiation to carry information out of the black hole, the entangled connection between particle pairs must be broken at the event horizon, so that the escaping particle can instead be entangled with the information-carrying matter within the black hole. This breaking of the original entanglement would make the escaping particles appear as an intense “firewall” at the surface of the event horizon. This would mean that anything falling toward the black hole wouldn’t make it into the black hole. Instead it would be vaporized by Hawking radiation when it reached the event horizon. This is known as the firewall paradox.

It would seem then that either the physical information of an object is lost when it falls into a black hole (information paradox) or objects are vaporized before entering a black hole (firewall paradox). Basically these ideas strike at the heart of the contradiction between general relativity and quantum theory.

Can Hawking save us?

This brings us to Stephen Hawking, and all the hullabaloo about his announcement that he’s solved the information paradox. Has he? The truth is we don’t know, but probably not. Hawking knows his stuff, but so do lots of other folks who have been working on this problem for years with less media attention. So far no one has been able to crack this nut. Hawking also hasn’t released a formal paper yet. So not only is his idea not peer reviewed, it’s not even public. Until we see the details there will be more speculation than facts.

But we do know a few things about the idea, and one interesting aspect is the fact that it’s not a quantum model. It actually draws upon the ideas of thermodynamics. Time for a little history.

In the late 1800s Ludwig Boltzmann proposed that the properties of a gas, such as its temperature and pressure, were due to the the motion and interactions of atoms and molecules. This had several advantages. For example, the hotter a gas, the faster the atoms and molecules would bounce around, therefore temperature was a measure of the kinetic (moving) energy of the atoms. The pressure of a gas is due to the atoms and molecules bouncing off the walls of the container. If the gas is heated, the atoms move faster and bounce off the container walls harder and more frequently. This explains why the pressure of an enclosed gas increases when you heat it.

Boltzmann’s kinetic theory not only explained how heat, work and energy are connected, it also gave a clear definition of entropy. The pressure, temperature and volume of a gas is known as the state of the gas. Since these are determined by the positions and speeds of all the atoms or molecules in the gas, Boltzmann called these the microstate of the gas (the state of all the microscopic particles). For a given state of the gas, there are lots of ways the atoms could be moving and bouncing around. As long as the average motion of all the atoms is about the same, then the pressure, temperature and volume of the gas will be the same. This means there are lots of equivalent microstates for a given state of the gas.

But how do equivalent microstates relate to heat flowing from hot to cold? Imagine an ice cube in a cup of warm water. The water molecules in the ice cube are frozen in a crystal structure. This structure is pretty rigid, so there aren’t a lot of ways for the water molecules to move. This means the number of equivalent microstates is rather small. As the ice melts the crystal structure breaks down, and the water molecules are much more free to move. This means there are many more equivalent microstates for water than for ice. So heat flows into the ice, which increases the number of equivalent microstates, so the entropy of the system increases. The second law of thermodynamics applies both ways.

The idea of equivalent microstates can be applied to general relativity through an idea known as degenerate vacuua. The region outside a black hole (the vacuum) is the same for a black hole with a particular mass, rotation and charge. But lots of things could have gone into making the black hole, from stars to old issues of National Geographic. A black hole made of hydrogen, or neutrons, or iron all look the same from the outside, so we could say that each type of black hole is a microstate, and thus all the different ways we could make a black hole are therefore equivalent microstates. Or in general relativity terms, their exteriors are degenerate vacua.

These different vacua are related by a type of symmetry relation known as BCS symmetry, or supertranslations. What Hawking seems to be saying is that these supertranslations can be used to connect the information inside a black hole with the outside world. Basically, these degnenerate vacua bias the Hawking radiation so that it isn’t random. That way the information can escape without creating a firewall. If the idea works, then it might solve the information paradox. But even the little information released about the work has raised some serious doubts from other experts. It seems to be based upon an idealized black hole that doesn’t match real black holes, and it might not work even then. Either way, it’s up for Hawking and his colleagues to prove their case.

So we still don’t know whether black holes tell no tales.

If you’ve made it this far, congratulations. This is a deeply complex topic, and while I’ve done my best to explain what I understand about it, I won’t claim to be an authority. Fortunately lots of other scientists have written about it as well. For a few good summaries check out Sabine Hossenfelder, Ethan Siegel, and Matt Strassler.
Stephen Hawking thinks he's solved a long standing problem in physics known as the information paradox. But has he?
43 comments on original post
1

Brian Oxley

Shared publicly  - 
 
Will they have Mars-like Internet?
A team of Nasa recruits begins living near an extinct volcano in Hawaii to mimic what life would be like on Mars.
1

Brian Oxley

Shared publicly  - 
 
Lurking Platonism.
1

Brian Oxley

Shared publicly  - 
 
Spooky action at a distance.
Experiment plugs loopholes in previous demonstrations of 'action at a distance', against Einstein's objections — and could make data encryption safer.
1

Brian Oxley

Shared publicly  - 
 
Astronaut Buzz Aldrin is teaming up with Florida Institute of Technology to develop a 'master plan' for humans to colonize Mars by the 70th anniversary of him landing on the Moon in 1969.
1
In his circles
388 people
Have him in circles
359 people
Apiumtech's profile photo
Paul Lucke's profile photo
Aymen Hammami's profile photo
Dan Sline's profile photo
MoAndy Jewelry's profile photo
Al Marcus's profile photo
Drench Sultan's profile photo
Stephen Chappell's profile photo
John Lombardo's profile photo

Brian Oxley

Shared publicly  - 
 
Heart you, too, Pluto.
A different astronomy and space science related image is featured each day, along with a brief explanation.
1

Brian Oxley

Shared publicly  - 
 
 
Inverse cube force law

Here you see three planets.  The blue planet is moving around the Sun in a realistic way: it's going around an ellipse.

The other two are moving in and out just like the blue one, so they all stay on the same circle, which shrinks and expands.  But they're moving around this circle more slowly.   In fact the red planet isn't going around at all: it only goes in and out!

In 1687, Isaac Newton published his famous book, the Principia Mathematica.  And one thing he did here is figure out what extra force, besides gravity, would make it move like these weird other planets.

According to Newton, gravity obeys an inverse square force law.  For example, if you move a planet 3 times as far from the Sun, it feels a force that's 1/9 as strong.  Figuring this out and using this to explain the motion of planets is one reason Newton is so famous.

But he also showed that if you add an extra force obeying an inverse cube law, and adjust the angular momentum of your planet, you can make it planet move in and out just as it did before... but make it move around at a different rate!  

This goes to show that Newton had intelligence to spare.  He didn't just solve the important problems that made him famous, he also had lots of minor ideas that still required amazing cleverness.

And turns out this strange fact he discovered is just one of several weird and fascinating things about the inverse cube force law.  For example, the so-called 'centrifugal force' obeys an inverse cube law.  It's not a real force; it's sometimes called a 'fictious force'.  But you can still describe it using an inverse cube law, and this ultimately explains Newton's discovery.

And a quantum particle in an inverse cube force behaves in a truly bizarre way, which people have been struggling to understand for decades.  If you think you understand quantum mechanics, this may make you reconsider.

I recently learned a lot about these things while writing a chapter for a book called New Spaces for Mathematics and Physics.

Why?  Well, it's a long story.   I've decided that most of what I learned doesn't belong in this paper.  But I had to write it down before I forgot it!  So I wrote this blog article:

https://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/2015/08/30/the-inverse-cube-force-law/

Go there if you're curious for more. 

Puzzle: how many times does the blue planet orbit the Sun for each time the green one does?

The animation was made by ‘WillowW’ and placed on Wikicommons:

If you can make a version of this animated gif that takes less than 1 megabyte, I can feature it on Visual Insight and credit you!

But the one I really want has a green planet going faster than the blue one.  It's here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Newton_revolving_orbit_3rd_harmonic_e0.6_240frames_smaller.gif
41 comments on original post
1

Brian Oxley

Shared publicly  - 
 
A reminder.
For millennia, the circle has been considered the most perfect of shapes, and the circle constant π captured the geometry of the circle in a single number. But π is wrong, and it’s time to set things right.
1
Eric Raymond's profile photo
 
There are actually some deep issues in metamathematics and minimum message length here.

See this discussion: http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=3481

Brian Oxley

Shared publicly  - 
 
Clever maths.
 
#math Cancellation is a Pain : How to avoid the pain of estimating tough sums https://goo.gl/QjlwyG
View original post
1
People
In his circles
388 people
Have him in circles
359 people
Apiumtech's profile photo
Paul Lucke's profile photo
Aymen Hammami's profile photo
Dan Sline's profile photo
MoAndy Jewelry's profile photo
Al Marcus's profile photo
Drench Sultan's profile photo
Stephen Chappell's profile photo
John Lombardo's profile photo
Education
  • Rice University
    Physics, Music, 1987 - 1991
  • Trinity University
    Physics, Music, 1985 - 1987
Basic Information
Gender
Male
Other names
binkley
Apps with Google+ Sign-in
  • Little Alchemy
Story
Introduction
It's just me.
Bragging rights
Best wife ever. Two wonderful sons. Full Moria armor set.
Work
Occupation
Principal Consultant
Employment
  • ThoughtWorks
    Principal Consultant, present
  • Macquarie Offshore Services
    Sr. Manager, 2013 - 2015
    IT Manager
  • Macquarie Group Limited
    Sr. Manager, 2010 - 2013
    Java Architect
  • ThoughtWorks
    Open Sourcerer, 2003 - 2004
    Developer
  • SimDesk
    Sr. Engineer
    Developer
  • Novasoft
    Software Engineer
    Developer
  • Merrill-Lynch
    Contractor
  • JPMorgan Chase & Co.
    Sr. Associate, 2006 - 2010
    Sr. Developer
Places
Map of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has lived
Currently
Houston, TX
Previously
Makati, Philippines - Three Rivers, TX - Boston, MA - San Antonio, TX
Links
Brian Oxley's +1's are the things they like, agree with, or want to recommend.
No, really, pi is wrong: The Tau Manifesto
tauday.com

For millennia, the circle has been considered the most perfect of shapes, and the circle constant π captured the geometry of the circle in a

Quantum ‘spookiness’ passes toughest test yet
www.nature.com

Experiment plugs loopholes in previous demonstrations of 'action at a distance', against Einstein's objections — and could make data encrypt

D&D 5th edition PayWhatYouWant reviews
realmofmelpomene.blogspot.com

My go-to game for the last six months have been 5th edition of Dungeons and Dragons. This has led me to look out for free or PayWhatYouWant

5 Entertaining Posts from StackOverFlow - Must Read
javarevisited.blogspot.com

StackOverFlow is great place to look for help, learn and participate, but it's also a great place to taste some real entertainment, contribu

One Card Adventure Templates
walkingmind.evilhat.com

They're not really design patterns, but I've been randomly sketching these as they occur to me. Will probably be throwing them up here inter

The obvious innovation in fifth-edition Dungeons & Dragons that no d...
dmdavid.com

Stirrups. Zero. Shipping containers. Luggage with wheels. All these innovations seem obvious in hindsight. But they went undiscovered for mi

How to Travel Faster Than Light Without Really Trying
briankoberlein.com

It turns out there are several ways things can travel faster than light, depending on what you mean by a “thing,” “faster-than-light,” and “

How Special is the Solar System?
briankoberlein.com

It increasingly looks like our solar system might be the exception rather than the norm.

Illegal Alien Crime Accounts for over 30% of Murders in Many States - Br...
www.breitbart.com

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump deserves credit for forcing all 17 Republican candidates to talk about the social costs of il

How The Witcher 3’s economy was saved by polynomial least squares | Ars ...
arstechnica.com

Amazingly, up until just a few months before release, the game didn't have an economy.

The Second Use Case for Literate Programming - 250bpm
250bpm.com

Everyone have heard that Donald Knuth have invented something called "literate programming". Everybody thinks that it's something like comme

Offline Chat App FireChat Now Able to Connect Phones Beyond Line of Sigh...
www.technologyreview.com

FireChat can link Android and Apple phones into a long-range communications network even when the cell network is down.

Dense star clusters shown to be binary black hole factories: Study predi...
www.sciencedaily.com

The merger of two black holes is one of the most sought-after observations of modern astronomy. The first observatories capable of directly

'Trillion-Dollar Asteroid' Zooms by Earth as Scientists Watch (Video)
www.space.com

An asteroid packed with about $5 trillion worth of platinum zoomed past Earth on Sunday (July 19). Asteroid 2011 UW158 missed Earth by about

What Are These Strange Scarlet Streaks Spotted on Tethys?
www.universetoday.com

Resembling what the skin on my arms looks like after giving my cat a bath, the surface of Saturn's moon Tethys is seen above in an extended-

Scientists Confirm 'Impossible' EM Drive Propulsion | Hacked
hacked.com

Later today, July 27, German scientists will present new experimental results on the controversial, "impossible" EM Drive, at the American I

xkcd: The Sky
xkcd.com

Warning: this comic occasionally contains strong language (which may be unsuitable for children), unusual humor (which may be unsuitable for

The Netflix Tech Blog: Java in Flames
techblog.netflix.com

Java mixed-mode flame graphs provide a complete visualization of CPU usage and have just been made possible by a new JDK option: -XX:+Preser

Astronomers Spot a Intriguing ‘5-Star’ Multiple System
www.universetoday.com

An interesting multiple star discovery turned up in the ongoing hunt for exoplanetary systems. The discovery was announced by Marcus Lohr of

Public - a month ago
reviewed a month ago
Neighborhood favorite
Public - a month ago
reviewed a month ago
Top job
Public - 4 months ago
reviewed 4 months ago
One of our favorite places in the Philippines. The staff was excellent, lacked for nothing. The nearby national parks are grand. Well recommended. Do note this is a "green" resort. Hot water is solar-heated, which may provide a surprise for your morning shower. We look forward to staying here again.
Public - 9 months ago
reviewed 9 months ago
27 reviews
Map
Map
Map
Great food
Public - 4 months ago
reviewed 4 months ago
Great environment, excellent staff, competitive pricing.
Public - a year ago
reviewed a year ago