Profile cover photo
Profile photo
Brent Neal
Scientist. Geek.
Scientist. Geek.

Brent Neal's posts

Can someone point out to me where the RSS feed for the Science Advances table of contents is hiding?

+AAAS - The American Association for the Advancement of Science 

Post has attachment
Our march towards Skynet carries on apace. 

Post has attachment
Just rediscovered these. Much fun around the dinner table discussing them. 

Post has attachment

Post has attachment
OK, so this is just cool. Props to my alma mater.

Post has attachment
Much of our current analgesic pharmacopeia derives from compounds extracted from field-grown poppies. With this advance, the production of opioid painkillers could be more tightly controlled, reducing the leakage of poppy extracts into the black market.

Dr. House would certainly approve of the targets chosen: one of the opioids produced by the researchers was hydrocodone, which when blended with acetominophen is marketed as his pill of choice, Vicodin.

"A complete biosynthesis of opioids in yeast," Science 349, 1095 (2015)

(h/t +Gerd Moe-Behrens)

Post has attachment
I can't wait to read the paper on this result. It is reasonable, I expect, to assume that the results have some limit of applicability due to the length scales that were sampled and that a larger interferometer with commensurately higher sensitivity might yield more information.

Post has shared content

Post has shared content
Canyon or Ridge?

On August 29, 2015, NASA astronaut Kjell Lindgren tweeted this photograph of a canyon from the International Space Station. "Flying over Arizona. Crazy how the shadows make this canyon look like a ridge!" he noted. Lindgren was noticing an optical illusion called relief inversion. The effect happens because most of us expect an image to be lit from the top left corner. When the sunlight comes from another angle (especially from the lower edge), the shadows fall in ways we don’t expect and our brains turn valleys into mountains to compensate. The problem is usually resolved by rotating the image so the light appears to come from the top of the image. In this case, does that work for you?

Read more about relief inversion at

Read a blog post about relief inversion at

Read more about relief inversion from Shaded Relief at

See Lindgren's original tweet at

Post has shared content
Can we build a time machine? Physicist +Brian Koberlein takes a look at the science, not the science fiction, that is at play. 
Could We Ever Build A Time Machine?

In fiction there are lots of ways to travel through time, from reaching 88 miles per hour in a DeLorean to walking through a circle of ancient Scottish stones. While the idea of time travel is centuries old, it had no basis in reality. But when Einstein developed his gravitational theory of general relativity, some physicists began to wonder if time travel might actually be possible.

One of the central ideas of general relativity is that there is no cosmic clock. While we always experience time at a normal rate, our rate can seem faster or slower relative to another observer. The relations between space and time are distorted by the presence of mass, and for objects such as black holes that distortion can be extreme. So could time be warped in such a way that it loops back on itself? In the 1970s, some physicists began to study this question in a serious way. Not as a serious effort to build a time machine, but as a way to explore the broader aspects of relativity.

One of the we can study the behavior of space and time is through what are known as light cones. Imagine a flash of light at a single point. The light would travel away from that point in all directions, so that the flash of light is an expanding sphere. Since nothing can travel faster than the speed of light, then that expanding sphere marks the limit of your influence. In general, you can’t move outside that sphere, because you can’t travel faster than light. Since it’s difficult to visualize 4-dimensional spacetime, we often imagine space as a two-dimensional surface, like a sheet of paper, and time as being the third dimension. You can imagine it as a stack of paper, with a cartoon drawing on each page, then flipping through the drawings would make them appear to move. Each sheet of paper would be a moment in time, and different pages in the stack of paper would be different moments in time. The only difference is that time is a continuum rather than discrete instants. In this visualization, an expanding sphere of light would start at a point, and with each higher page would be a larger and larger circle. If you flipped through the pages you would see an expanding circle of light. If instead you could see through the paper and just look at the circles, then you would see they form a cone starting at a particular point. This is known as a light cone, and it defines the limit of influence of an object at the point. An object at the starting point cannot influence anything outside of that light cone, nor can it ever move beyond the limit of that light cone.

The path of an object that stays within the light cone is called “timelike,” since it follows the motion of the object through time. Relativity requires that the path of all objects be timelike. So in general relativity the question becomes whether light cones can be warped in such a way that the timelike path of an object connects with its own past. If you found yourself in such a wibbly-wobbly spacetime it would be possible to meet your younger self. Such a loop is known as a closed timelike curve (CTC), and would be an actual time machine.

Interestingly, CTCs are absolutely possible within the theory of general relativity. One place where CTCs appear is in a solution to Einstein’s gravity equations known as the Gödel universe. This is a general relativistic description of a universe with an inherent rotation to it. Of course we know observationally that our universe doesn’t have such an inherent rotation, so the Gödel model doesn’t match reality. CTCs also appear inside a rotating black hole. A rotating mass causes space and time to swirl around it a bit (an effect known as frame dragging). Once you are within the event horizon of the black hole this swirling becomes strong enough there are CTCs. But this is only true if there is a singularity within the black hole, and its most likely that quantum physics prevents such a singularity from forming.

It doesn’t look like time machines occur naturally, so what about creating an artificial one? In the 1980s, Kip Thorne proposed using a wormhole as a time machine. Wormholes are purely hypothetical, and if they did exist they would collapse before you could travel through one. But Thorne found that if you could magically prevent a wormhole from collapsing, it could be used to create a time machine. Thorne’s model was simply a “what-if” scenario intended to test the limits of general relativity, but others such as Ron Mallett think it might be possible. Mallet has found a solution to general relativity that allows for CTCs without an event horizon. What Mallett has shown is that light can curve space and time in the same way as mass. By creating a rotating ring of laser light it is possible to distort space and time in a way similar to the way it is distorted by the rotating mass of a black hole, but without the black hole. This, he argues, opens the door to the possibility of creating a time loop. Critics have pointed out that Mallet’s solution still contains a singularity, so it isn’t a valid physical solution, but Mallett argues the singularity in his solution is an artifact that doesn’t affect the physics.

As for who’s right, time will tell. It’s easy to create a theoretical time machine within general relativity, the physics of matter and energy seem to prevent the creation of a real time machine. So could we ever build a time machine? Almost certainly not.

But that’s not a no.

Paper: Ronald L. Mallett. The Gravitational Field of a Circulating Light Beam. Foundations of Physics, Vol. 33, No. 9 (2003).
Wait while more posts are being loaded