Is it that journals from Latin America, which unlike Europe and North America have not been outsourced to commercial publishers, have significantly improved their quality with the help of Latindex, SciELO, Redalyc, the national collections of quality journals and the journal collections in digital repositories, and now those journals are attracting the attention of major international commercial publishers interested in offering their services to journals and governments in the region as we observe in several countries in Latin America? Does it have relation to the interest of promoting a new big business of "pay to publish" in a region that has no tradition of APC´s? Is this moving so fast before governments realize that the scholarly community could go on managing open access scholarly communications without commercial intermediaries, based on networks of open access digital repositories that incorporate peer review, indicators for evaluation and other services needed for open science, open education and open access?.
In any case, the kind of message the blogpost transmits paves the way for a gold rush for uninformed readers. A blogpost full of prejudice and lack of knowledge and understanding about the region (eg .: not mentioned the impressive use of both services criticized in the blog, or only US users are of interest?; no reference is made to the impact of these services beyond academics (Alperin, 2015). Comments like the mentioned blogpost do not add to think a sustainable global system of open access scholarly communication that could contribute to a global conversation of science that is inclusive of different research agendas, realities, voices, and geographies.
The contents of SciELO, Redalyc and digital repositories from Latin America are broadly visible and accessible, not “largely hidden” as the author mentions. Unlike international subscription journals, visible only to those who can pay. Or we only consider visible what is indexed by WoS and Scopus, managed by the companies Thomson Reuters and Elsevier, which only index a small fraction of quality journals from Latin America indexed by Latindex ?.
Great tweet from Joan Velterop (Netherlands), connoisseur of commercial publishers, in relation to the abovementioned blogpost
@Jⓐn VelteropVillavelius July 31
Who's paying this guy? Calling commercial publishers "nice neighborhoods" and SciELO "publication favela". http://scholarlyoa.com/2015/07/30/is-scielo-a-publication-favela/ …
I close this message by thanking again colleagues from the North who, unlike the author of the abovementioned blogpost, do strive to understand Latin America, evaluate its contribution to non-commercial open access and imagine together with developing regions possible futures for open access scholarly communications: Jean-Claude Guédon, Leslie Chan, John Willinsky, Kathleen Shearer, Eloy Rodrigues, Heather Joseph, Richard Poynder, Reme Melero, Bjorn Brembs, Barbara Kirsop, Iryna Kuchma, among others (I do not include Juan Pablo Alperin and Gustavo Fischman because they live now in Canada and the United States but are from Argentina !!!)
CLACSO-Open Access Program
July 31, 2015
- Universität RegensburgProfessor, present
- Freie Universität BerlinNeurobiologist, 2003 - 2012
- bjoern.brembs.blog (current)
Do scholars prefer to apply restrictive licenses to Open Access articles...
A researcher who decides to publish in Open Access, not only chooses a publishing model, but he also needs to choose one of the available co
Conspiracies all the way down: Is your local climate contrarian a kook o...
A new paper has just been published. This paper is going to cause an uproar in the science denialist community. Mud will be thrown. Tin hats
Curses! It's a conspiracy! The Fury is Back Thrice Over
I don't know if you saw the wonderful conspiracy theory from the sockpuppeting ex-mod at WUWT, dbstealey (who has also posted as Smokey, D B
Lazy ants sit around doing nothing while their nest mates work
Some ants are much lazier than others – in fact, they make a career out of it. But maybe they are more than just freeloaders
Why are librarians hesitant to CANCEL ALL THE JOURNALS?
There’s lots of discussion out there right now in the twitter and blog world concerning Bjorn Brembs’ call to librarians to jumpstart the ma
Jean-Claude Burgelman: the new open science paradigm requires fine tunin...
The EC Science 2.0 consultation , whose results have recently been published, raised a number of issues that need tackling before science ca
"From Concerned to Cautiously Optimistic: Assessing Faculty Perceptions"...
INTRODUCTION Though open access publishing has many advantages for scholars, very few are interested in learning about and pursuing open acc
The facts vs. David Brooks: Startling inaccuracies raise questions about...
Factual discrepancies in the NYT columnist's new book raise some alarming questions about his research & methods
Patrick S. Forscher: What we can learn from the LaCour data fabrication ...
About two weeks ago, news broke that Michael LaCour, the first author of a study about how, purportedly, gay canvassers can successfully imp
Peer-review journals monopolize research, hurt students and faculty - Th...
Columnist Jacob Schmidt argues the current academic journal system limits freedom of information.
Zoological Letters | Full text | Toward elucidating diversity of neural ...
Insects are widely used as models to study neural mechanisms of learning and memory. Our recent studies on crickets, together with reports o
Journals investigate climate skeptic author’s ties to fossil fuel firm a...
Activists raise new questions about disclosure by Willie Soon
Fixing Psychology: The academic job market has gotten harder, very recently
There have been many stories recently about the "overproduction" of Ph.D. students in science, and about the increasingly competitive job ma
Elsevier admits they’re a major obstacle for women scientists in the dev...
Nominations opened today for the Elsevier Foundation Awards for Early-Career Women Scientists in the Developing World, a high-profile honor
Sexist peer review elicits furious Twitter response
Manuscript investigated gender differences in Ph.D.-to-postdoc transition