Profile

Cover photo
Bijan Soleymani
Attends McGill University
Lives in Montreal
28 followers|15,678 views
AboutPostsPhotosYouTube

Stream

Bijan Soleymani

Shared publicly  - 
 
Starting my real job.
1
Remigio Mariano's profile photoBijan Soleymani's profile photo
5 comments
 
Yes...
Add a comment...

Bijan Soleymani

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
This is really stupid. It doesn't make sense. First if your dad has sperm in the fridge it's probably because your parents are taking it to a fertility clinic, so you'd be a real asshole to waste it in any way. Second doesn't the guy care about taste? I mean as far as I know most people wouldn't like the taste of a bottle full of sperm. And why is there so much sperm? Like is his dad saving his sperm for a whole month into the same bottle?
1
Add a comment...

Bijan Soleymani

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
Thanks for the video.

Though to me the headline's kind of a half truth. From what I understand of the video (and I am likely wrong, as I don't speak arabic), is that it sounds like they went on the roof to prevent the destruction of a house, which from the sound of it wasn't destroyed. Since Israel claims (and sometimes boasts) that they cancel attacks if they see civilians, this seems like at least somewhat reasonable. Though I don't think I'd test my luck...

And before you call me bats$4it crazy, here is a video of this exact tactic being used and the IDF calling off the attack:
IDF Avoids Civilians Casualties in Gaza, Hamas Increases Them

Again the half truth is because when I read the headline, I immediately assumed that they were admitting to using human shields on military targets, or in order to increase civilian casualties. Though it is entirely true that they are using human shields, it is somewhat deceptive.
1
Add a comment...

Bijan Soleymani

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
Here's the updated English transcript:
0:00-3:10

Q:
Norman Finkelstein, professor of political science
and author of the book Image and Reality of the Israel-Palestine Conflict, from New York.

What's the reality of the current conflict?  What is Israel's goal in this high casualty war?

Norm:
The attack against Hamas started because Hamas joined the Palestinian Unity government.  

Hamas had accepted the conditions stipulated by the US and EU.

Hamas accepted these conditions and agreed to form a National Unity government.

Prime Minister Netanyahu exploited the abduction and killing of three Israeli teenagers as a pretext - - it's a pretext because no one knows who was behind the abduction and killing - - to attack Hamas and break up the Unity government, so as to give Israel a new excuse not to pursue peace negotiations.  

At first Israel said it couldn't negotiate with the Palestinian Authority because the PA didn't represent all of the Palestinian people.

But if the Unity government went ahead, then this excuse would have been removed.  
An Israeli political scientist once termed this sort of panicky Israeli reaction, the fear of a Palestinian "peace offensive," because it eliminates Israel's excuse for not negotiating a settlement.


That was phase one, we are now entering phase two.  

The Israeli government knows that if it launches a ground invasion, it will face a big dilemma, because Israeli troops will suffer a large number of casualties. 

During the 2008-9 Israeli massacre in Gaza, it destroyed everything in sight in order to avoid combatant deaths.

But if Israel once again tries to destroy everything in sight, the international community won't allow it...[interrupted by question]

3:10-5:10:
Q:
[interrupted by question]
Mr Finkelstein you are pointing out that Israelis don't want peace when in fact it is these Israelis who see themselves as being targets of Hamas rockets which 
people, which country in the world doesn't want peace and doesn't want to live in peace and quiet?

Norm:
Israel wants peace. Every country wants peace.

Every aggressor in history wanted peace.

The question is what kind of peace?  Peace under what conditions?

Israel says it has a right to defend itself.

The British government and the BBC support this right of self-defense in the face of Hamas's primitive rocket attacks. 

But Israel is not demanding the right of self-defense.

Israel is demanding the right to maintain the occupation, and the right to kill Palestinians who resist the occupation. 

The first right is, the right to continue the occupation, and the second right is to kill Palestinians who resist the occupation.

On the other side, Palestinians are given two rights, the right to die slowly under the blockade of Gaza, the merciless, cynical, heartless blockade of Gaza, 
or the right to die quickly under Israel's murderous assault 

[interrupted by question, translator stops]

5:10-7:18:
Q:
Mr. Finkelstein before this interview we had an interview with a Hamas spokesperson

the Hamas spokesperson said "we don't recognize Israel."

Many Israelis and Israeli officials say how can we live beside a group that is armed, and has a territory under its control and doesn't recognize our right to 

live.

Norm:
I think you're having a problem listening to me, but I think my English is pretty clear.  
We can surely both agree that a Unity government was formed.

Hamas agreed to the conditions of this Unity government, conditions that were stipulated by the US and EU.

So what's the problem with negotiating with them?

The problem is Israel doesn't want to negotiate.

This is why Israel went on a rampage in the West Bank after the abduction of the three Israeli teenagers.

They arrested 750 Palestinians, killed 11 civilians, including 4 children, wrecked people's homes.

All this was to evoke a reaction from Hamas, so that Israel could avoid negotiations.  
Now I ask you, If the Unity government was formed, and the US and EU agreed to negotiate with the Unity government, what prevented a settlement?  You say it 

was Hamas. But that just makes you an apologist for Israel, because the US and EU agreed to negotiate with the Unity government.  Why are you being an 
apologist for Israel? [interrupted by question]

7:18-end
Q: Mr Finkelstein I brought up the Israeli point of view, we are not in a position to take sides, to support or denounce either side, we're an impartial 
source. You have written books about the conflict between Israel and Palestine and have worked and researched in this field. This current situation what effect 
could it have on Israel? Please answer briefly, thank you.

If Israel launches a ground invasion, it has to destroy everything in sight, because Israeli society won't tolerate combatant casualties.

Israelis like high-tech massacres, they don't want an actual war and to see their own casualties.

But Israel can't destroy everything in sight, because after the 2008-9 massacre -- when 1400 Palestinians were killed, up to 1200 of whom were civilians, while 

on the Israeli side 13 were killed, and only 3 were civilians-- the international community will not tolerate such a bloodbath on the part of Israel.  Israel 
can't stop the Hamas rocket attacks without an invasion, but it can't invade without causing massive death and destruction, which the international community 
won't allow.


Here I want to echo what Amnesty International said.   First, there should be a comprehensive arms embargo on Israel and Palestine.

Second, there should be an international investigation of the war crimes committed on both sides.

And third--this is my suggestion, not Amnesty's, and it's the most important--the international community should impose sanctions on Israel until and unless 

Israel agrees to end this conflict, once and for all, under the terms of international law.

This demand is simple, clear, and unassailable.  Israel must end the conflict under the terms of international law.

Israel does not have the right to go into Gaza every few years and--to use their hideous expression--mow the lawn."  

The days of Israel mowing the lawn must end.  And Israel should be subjected to sanctions until and unless it ends the conflict on the basis of international law.

Q:
Norman Finkelstein American political scientist and author of the book Image and Reality of the Israel-Palestine Conflict, I thank you for your presence on 
this show.
1
Add a comment...
Have him in circles
28 people
Patrick Sloan McMullen's profile photo
Ernest Hon's profile photo
Vadim M's profile photo
Alexei Northover's profile photo
Jad Baydoun's profile photo
Roba Nustrale's profile photo
Mbadrinks Toronto's profile photo
Evgeny Mintz's profile photo
Louis-Philippe Gauthier's profile photo

Bijan Soleymani

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
Sounds like Persian/Iranian

Sob Bekheir (good morning)

Ishoon Khoshkel Ast (she is good looking)
1
Add a comment...

Bijan Soleymani

Shared publicly  - 
 
My response to some basic questions about the conflict.
I had a lot of trouble coming up with today's post, but then I got into an interesting facebook discussion and will simply edit my comments from that discussion into a unified Post. Disappearing Palestine 1947-2014. Q: Both sides have not compromised enough. The problem in this case is that one ...
1
Add a comment...

Bijan Soleymani

Shared publicly  - 
1
Add a comment...

Bijan Soleymani

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
A version with English subtitles, still not a real English version though:
Truth about Gaza that BBC Tried to Suppress (Norman Finkelstein)
1
Add a comment...

Bijan Soleymani

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
Here's the updated English transcript:
0:00-3:10

Q:
Norman Finkelstein, professor of political science
and author of the book Image and Reality of the Israel-Palestine Conflict, from New York.

What's the reality of the current conflict?  What is Israel's goal in this high casualty war?

Norm:
The attack against Hamas started because Hamas joined the Palestinian Unity government.  

Hamas had accepted the conditions stipulated by the US and EU.

Hamas accepted these conditions and agreed to form a National Unity government.

Prime Minister Netanyahu exploited the abduction and killing of three Israeli teenagers as a pretext - - it's a pretext because no one knows who was behind the abduction and killing - - to attack Hamas and break up the Unity government, so as to give Israel a new excuse not to pursue peace negotiations.  

At first Israel said it couldn't negotiate with the Palestinian Authority because the PA didn't represent all of the Palestinian people.

But if the Unity government went ahead, then this excuse would have been removed.  
An Israeli political scientist once termed this sort of panicky Israeli reaction, the fear of a Palestinian "peace offensive," because it eliminates Israel's excuse for not negotiating a settlement.


That was phase one, we are now entering phase two.  

The Israeli government knows that if it launches a ground invasion, it will face a big dilemma, because Israeli troops will suffer a large number of casualties. 

During the 2008-9 Israeli massacre in Gaza, it destroyed everything in sight in order to avoid combatant deaths.

But if Israel once again tries to destroy everything in sight, the international community won't allow it...[interrupted by question]

3:10-5:10:
Q:
[interrupted by question]
Mr Finkelstein you are pointing out that Israelis don't want peace when in fact it is these Israelis who see themselves as being targets of Hamas rockets which 
people, which country in the world doesn't want peace and doesn't want to live in peace and quiet?

Norm:
Israel wants peace. Every country wants peace.

Every aggressor in history wanted peace.

The question is what kind of peace?  Peace under what conditions?

Israel says it has a right to defend itself.

The British government and the BBC support this right of self-defense in the face of Hamas's primitive rocket attacks. 

But Israel is not demanding the right of self-defense.

Israel is demanding the right to maintain the occupation, and the right to kill Palestinians who resist the occupation. 

The first right is, the right to continue the occupation, and the second right is to kill Palestinians who resist the occupation.

On the other side, Palestinians are given two rights, the right to die slowly under the blockade of Gaza, the merciless, cynical, heartless blockade of Gaza, 
or the right to die quickly under Israel's murderous assault 

[interrupted by question, translator stops]

5:10-7:18:
Q:
Mr. Finkelstein before this interview we had an interview with a Hamas spokesperson

the Hamas spokesperson said "we don't recognize Israel."

Many Israelis and Israeli officials say how can we live beside a group that is armed, and has a territory under its control and doesn't recognize our right to 

live.

Norm:
I think you're having a problem listening to me, but I think my English is pretty clear.  
We can surely both agree that a Unity government was formed.

Hamas agreed to the conditions of this Unity government, conditions that were stipulated by the US and EU.

So what's the problem with negotiating with them?

The problem is Israel doesn't want to negotiate.

This is why Israel went on a rampage in the West Bank after the abduction of the three Israeli teenagers.

They arrested 750 Palestinians, killed 11 civilians, including 4 children, wrecked people's homes.

All this was to evoke a reaction from Hamas, so that Israel could avoid negotiations.  
Now I ask you, If the Unity government was formed, and the US and EU agreed to negotiate with the Unity government, what prevented a settlement?  You say it 

was Hamas. But that just makes you an apologist for Israel, because the US and EU agreed to negotiate with the Unity government.  Why are you being an 
apologist for Israel? [interrupted by question]

7:18-end
Q: Mr Finkelstein I brought up the Israeli point of view, we are not in a position to take sides, to support or denounce either side, we're an impartial 
source. You have written books about the conflict between Israel and Palestine and have worked and researched in this field. This current situation what effect 
could it have on Israel? Please answer briefly, thank you.

If Israel launches a ground invasion, it has to destroy everything in sight, because Israeli society won't tolerate combatant casualties.

Israelis like high-tech massacres, they don't want an actual war and to see their own casualties.

But Israel can't destroy everything in sight, because after the 2008-9 massacre -- when 1400 Palestinians were killed, up to 1200 of whom were civilians, while 

on the Israeli side 13 were killed, and only 3 were civilians-- the international community will not tolerate such a bloodbath on the part of Israel.  Israel 
can't stop the Hamas rocket attacks without an invasion, but it can't invade without causing massive death and destruction, which the international community 
won't allow.


Here I want to echo what Amnesty International said.   First, there should be a comprehensive arms embargo on Israel and Palestine.

Second, there should be an international investigation of the war crimes committed on both sides.

And third--this is my suggestion, not Amnesty's, and it's the most important--the international community should impose sanctions on Israel until and unless 

Israel agrees to end this conflict, once and for all, under the terms of international law.

This demand is simple, clear, and unassailable.  Israel must end the conflict under the terms of international law.

Israel does not have the right to go into Gaza every few years and - - to use their hideous expression - -"mow the lawn."  

The days of Israel mowing the lawn must end.  And Israel should be subjected to sanctions until and unless it ends the conflict on the basis of international law.

Q:
Norman Finkelstein American political scientist and author of the book Image and Reality of the Israel-Palestine Conflict, I thank you for your presence on 
this show.
16
el bajoh's profile photo
el bajoh
+
1
1
2
1
 
Thank you very much for the script! Really nice of you. Cheers
Add a comment...
People
Have him in circles
28 people
Patrick Sloan McMullen's profile photo
Ernest Hon's profile photo
Vadim M's profile photo
Alexei Northover's profile photo
Jad Baydoun's profile photo
Roba Nustrale's profile photo
Mbadrinks Toronto's profile photo
Evgeny Mintz's profile photo
Louis-Philippe Gauthier's profile photo
Education
  • McGill University
    present
Basic Information
Gender
Male
Apps with Google+ Sign-in
  • Clash of Clans
Work
Occupation
Student
Employment
  • Student, present
Places
Map of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has lived
Currently
Montreal
Previously
Montreal