Profile

Cover photo
Ben Coleman
Lives in Hastings, United Kingdom
609 followers|142,085 views
AboutPosts

Stream

 
To add insult to injury the actor who felt hard done by after Star Wars and didn't get the success he deserved, The Independent (UK newspaper) calls him MIKE Hamill. D'oh!

Star Wars Episode 7 to be set 30 years after Return of the Jedi http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/star-wars-7-to-be-set-30-years-after-return-of-the-jedi-disney-confirms-9201501.html
6
Add a comment...

Ben Coleman

World News Discussion  - 
 
 
OK.  I've not been on for a while - new job, nearly split from the missus and the like but I had to come on and voice my opinion on Ukraine, Russia and the Crimea.  It's been bugging me that much!

Why?  Well, I'm sure there is more than meets the eye here.  There are reports of snipers shooting both the revolutionaries and Yanukovych so something's afoot.  But that's not the bother, it's the hypocrisy.  Not anything Russia's doing but "The West" my government included.

Now I'm sure that a lot of Westerners won't agree with me but consider this.  We are adamant that Russia must not annex Ukraine.  We are adamant that the Crimean government should not hold a referendum to decide it's own future.  We are adamant that it should remain a part of the Ukraine and Russian boots must not be on the ground there.

What do I have to say about that?  Kosovo!

Here's a part of another country, Serbia, where the majority of it's citizens were of another ethnicity.  Just like Crimea.  Here is a region where the ethnic majority decided for itself to secede from that country and choose it's own future.  Just like Crimea.  And The West supported the ethnic Albanians in their right to self determination and it is now recognised as an independent republic.

So why can't we recognise the majority ethnic Russians in Crimea right to self determination?  Remove all of the politics and hidden agendas that each nation has here, the basic principle is the same.  Two groups of people, who inhabit a region of a larger country and make up the majority of the ethnic population there, decided they wanted a different a different future.  One group we recognised, the other we've refused.

What I find particularly galling is that the region of Kosovo is considered historically by Serbs to be their homeland, where their people originated from.  During the Ottoman period Albanians moved into the region making up the majority population and in the present day broke away, with Western support, thus robbing Serbia a part of it's own land which was a part of it since Serbia came into existence.

Crimea however, has in contrast never been part of a Ukrainian homeland.  In fact, until the 20th century the majority of the population were Turkic with Armenian, Bulgarian and Greek minorities.  All relocated to central Asia by Stalin.  It was then that it was settled by Russians.  As a part of the Soviet Union the Crimean ASSR, succeeded by the Crimean Oblast, was always a part of Russia.  In 1954 Khrushchev, a Ukrainian, transferred the Crimea to The Ukrainian SSR to mark the anniversary of the Ukraine becoming a part of the Russian Empire.

I can't abide by the double standards of politicians and I'm sorry if you don't agree with me but on these two occasions I believe Russia has it right.  Kosovo should never have become independent, it'd be like Kent in England being settled by so many Eastern Europeans that they made up the majority population and then declared independence, it would never happen, and if the Crimean people vote in a referendum to join Russia, I genuinely don't have a problem with that.
1
Add a comment...

Ben Coleman

Foreign Policy  - 
 
 
OK.  I've not been on for a while - new job, nearly split from the missus and the like but I had to come on and voice my opinion on Ukraine, Russia and the Crimea.  It's been bugging me that much!

Why?  Well, I'm sure there is more than meets the eye here.  There are reports of snipers shooting both the revolutionaries and Yanukovych so something's afoot.  But that's not the bother, it's the hypocrisy.  Not anything Russia's doing but "The West" my government included.

Now I'm sure that a lot of Westerners won't agree with me but consider this.  We are adamant that Russia must not annex Ukraine.  We are adamant that the Crimean government should not hold a referendum to decide it's own future.  We are adamant that it should remain a part of the Ukraine and Russian boots must not be on the ground there.

What do I have to say about that?  Kosovo!

Here's a part of another country, Serbia, where the majority of it's citizens were of another ethnicity.  Just like Crimea.  Here is a region where the ethnic majority decided for itself to secede from that country and choose it's own future.  Just like Crimea.  And The West supported the ethnic Albanians in their right to self determination and it is now recognised as an independent republic.

So why can't we recognise the majority ethnic Russians in Crimea right to self determination?  Remove all of the politics and hidden agendas that each nation has here, the basic principle is the same.  Two groups of people, who inhabit a region of a larger country and make up the majority of the ethnic population there, decided they wanted a different a different future.  One group we recognised, the other we've refused.

What I find particularly galling is that the region of Kosovo is considered historically by Serbs to be their homeland, where their people originated from.  During the Ottoman period Albanians moved into the region making up the majority population and in the present day broke away, with Western support, thus robbing Serbia a part of it's own land which was a part of it since Serbia came into existence.

Crimea however, has in contrast never been part of a Ukrainian homeland.  In fact, until the 20th century the majority of the population were Turkic with Armenian, Bulgarian and Greek minorities.  All relocated to central Asia by Stalin.  It was then that it was settled by Russians.  As a part of the Soviet Union the Crimean ASSR, succeeded by the Crimean Oblast, was always a part of Russia.  In 1954 Khrushchev, a Ukrainian, transferred the Crimea to The Ukrainian SSR to mark the anniversary of the Ukraine becoming a part of the Russian Empire.

I can't abide by the double standards of politicians and I'm sorry if you don't agree with me but on these two occasions I believe Russia has it right.  Kosovo should never have become independent, it'd be like Kent in England being settled by so many Eastern Europeans that they made up the majority population and then declared independence, it would never happen, and if the Crimean people vote in a referendum to join Russia, I genuinely don't have a problem with that.
1
Add a comment...

Ben Coleman

Discussion  - 
 
 
OK.  I've not been on for a while - new job, nearly split from the missus and the like but I had to come on and voice my opinion on Ukraine, Russia and the Crimea.  It's been bugging me that much!

Why?  Well, I'm sure there is more than meets the eye here.  There are reports of snipers shooting both the revolutionaries and Yanukovych so something's afoot.  But that's not the bother, it's the hypocrisy.  Not anything Russia's doing but "The West" my government included.

Now I'm sure that a lot of Westerners won't agree with me but consider this.  We are adamant that Russia must not annex Ukraine.  We are adamant that the Crimean government should not hold a referendum to decide it's own future.  We are adamant that it should remain a part of the Ukraine and Russian boots must not be on the ground there.

What do I have to say about that?  Kosovo!

Here's a part of another country, Serbia, where the majority of it's citizens were of another ethnicity.  Just like Crimea.  Here is a region where the ethnic majority decided for itself to secede from that country and choose it's own future.  Just like Crimea.  And The West supported the ethnic Albanians in their right to self determination and it is now recognised as an independent republic.

So why can't we recognise the majority ethnic Russians in Crimea right to self determination?  Remove all of the politics and hidden agendas that each nation has here, the basic principle is the same.  Two groups of people, who inhabit a region of a larger country and make up the majority of the ethnic population there, decided they wanted a different a different future.  One group we recognised, the other we've refused.

What I find particularly galling is that the region of Kosovo is considered historically by Serbs to be their homeland, where their people originated from.  During the Ottoman period Albanians moved into the region making up the majority population and in the present day broke away, with Western support, thus robbing Serbia a part of it's own land which was a part of it since Serbia came into existence.

Crimea however, has in contrast never been part of a Ukrainian homeland.  In fact, until the 20th century the majority of the population were Turkic with Armenian, Bulgarian and Greek minorities.  All relocated to central Asia by Stalin.  It was then that it was settled by Russians.  As a part of the Soviet Union the Crimean ASSR, succeeded by the Crimean Oblast, was always a part of Russia.  In 1954 Khrushchev, a Ukrainian, transferred the Crimea to The Ukrainian SSR to mark the anniversary of the Ukraine becoming a part of the Russian Empire.

I can't abide by the double standards of politicians and I'm sorry if you don't agree with me but on these two occasions I believe Russia has it right.  Kosovo should never have become independent, it'd be like Kent in England being settled by so many Eastern Europeans that they made up the majority population and then declared independence, it would never happen, and if the Crimean people vote in a referendum to join Russia, I genuinely don't have a problem with that.
1
Add a comment...

Ben Coleman

Shared publicly  - 
 
At the end of a hard day...
3
DealsByDi DLB's profile photoGreg Milner's profile photoMichael Hutter's profile photo
3 comments
 
If the bottle started out full, I'd say it was a really hard day! .-)
In his circles
77 people
Have him in circles
609 people

Ben Coleman

Shared publicly  - 
 
This is so funny.
 
Cool +Game of Thrones billboard, but rather unfortunate placement...
3
1
Peter Johnstone's profile photo

Ben Coleman

Imperialism and Colonialism  - 
 
 
OK.  I've not been on for a while - new job, nearly split from the missus and the like but I had to come on and voice my opinion on Ukraine, Russia and the Crimea.  It's been bugging me that much!

Why?  Well, I'm sure there is more than meets the eye here.  There are reports of snipers shooting both the revolutionaries and Yanukovych so something's afoot.  But that's not the bother, it's the hypocrisy.  Not anything Russia's doing but "The West" my government included.

Now I'm sure that a lot of Westerners won't agree with me but consider this.  We are adamant that Russia must not annex Ukraine.  We are adamant that the Crimean government should not hold a referendum to decide it's own future.  We are adamant that it should remain a part of the Ukraine and Russian boots must not be on the ground there.

What do I have to say about that?  Kosovo!

Here's a part of another country, Serbia, where the majority of it's citizens were of another ethnicity.  Just like Crimea.  Here is a region where the ethnic majority decided for itself to secede from that country and choose it's own future.  Just like Crimea.  And The West supported the ethnic Albanians in their right to self determination and it is now recognised as an independent republic.

So why can't we recognise the majority ethnic Russians in Crimea right to self determination?  Remove all of the politics and hidden agendas that each nation has here, the basic principle is the same.  Two groups of people, who inhabit a region of a larger country and make up the majority of the ethnic population there, decided they wanted a different a different future.  One group we recognised, the other we've refused.

What I find particularly galling is that the region of Kosovo is considered historically by Serbs to be their homeland, where their people originated from.  During the Ottoman period Albanians moved into the region making up the majority population and in the present day broke away, with Western support, thus robbing Serbia a part of it's own land which was a part of it since Serbia came into existence.

Crimea however, has in contrast never been part of a Ukrainian homeland.  In fact, until the 20th century the majority of the population were Turkic with Armenian, Bulgarian and Greek minorities.  All relocated to central Asia by Stalin.  It was then that it was settled by Russians.  As a part of the Soviet Union the Crimean ASSR, succeeded by the Crimean Oblast, was always a part of Russia.  In 1954 Khrushchev, a Ukrainian, transferred the Crimea to The Ukrainian SSR to mark the anniversary of the Ukraine becoming a part of the Russian Empire.

I can't abide by the double standards of politicians and I'm sorry if you don't agree with me but on these two occasions I believe Russia has it right.  Kosovo should never have become independent, it'd be like Kent in England being settled by so many Eastern Europeans that they made up the majority population and then declared independence, it would never happen, and if the Crimean people vote in a referendum to join Russia, I genuinely don't have a problem with that.
3
Add a comment...

Ben Coleman

Discussion (Обсуждение)  - 
 
 
OK.  I've not been on for a while - new job, nearly split from the missus and the like but I had to come on and voice my opinion on Ukraine, Russia and the Crimea.  It's been bugging me that much!

Why?  Well, I'm sure there is more than meets the eye here.  There are reports of snipers shooting both the revolutionaries and Yanukovych so something's afoot.  But that's not the bother, it's the hypocrisy.  Not anything Russia's doing but "The West" my government included.

Now I'm sure that a lot of Westerners won't agree with me but consider this.  We are adamant that Russia must not annex Ukraine.  We are adamant that the Crimean government should not hold a referendum to decide it's own future.  We are adamant that it should remain a part of the Ukraine and Russian boots must not be on the ground there.

What do I have to say about that?  Kosovo!

Here's a part of another country, Serbia, where the majority of it's citizens were of another ethnicity.  Just like Crimea.  Here is a region where the ethnic majority decided for itself to secede from that country and choose it's own future.  Just like Crimea.  And The West supported the ethnic Albanians in their right to self determination and it is now recognised as an independent republic.

So why can't we recognise the majority ethnic Russians in Crimea right to self determination?  Remove all of the politics and hidden agendas that each nation has here, the basic principle is the same.  Two groups of people, who inhabit a region of a larger country and make up the majority of the ethnic population there, decided they wanted a different a different future.  One group we recognised, the other we've refused.

What I find particularly galling is that the region of Kosovo is considered historically by Serbs to be their homeland, where their people originated from.  During the Ottoman period Albanians moved into the region making up the majority population and in the present day broke away, with Western support, thus robbing Serbia a part of it's own land which was a part of it since Serbia came into existence.

Crimea however, has in contrast never been part of a Ukrainian homeland.  In fact, until the 20th century the majority of the population were Turkic with Armenian, Bulgarian and Greek minorities.  All relocated to central Asia by Stalin.  It was then that it was settled by Russians.  As a part of the Soviet Union the Crimean ASSR, succeeded by the Crimean Oblast, was always a part of Russia.  In 1954 Khrushchev, a Ukrainian, transferred the Crimea to The Ukrainian SSR to mark the anniversary of the Ukraine becoming a part of the Russian Empire.

I can't abide by the double standards of politicians and I'm sorry if you don't agree with me but on these two occasions I believe Russia has it right.  Kosovo should never have become independent, it'd be like Kent in England being settled by so many Eastern Europeans that they made up the majority population and then declared independence, it would never happen, and if the Crimean people vote in a referendum to join Russia, I genuinely don't have a problem with that.
1
Add a comment...

Ben Coleman

Shared publicly  - 
 
OK.  I've not been on for a while - new job, nearly split from the missus and the like but I had to come on and voice my opinion on Ukraine, Russia and the Crimea.  It's been bugging me that much!

Why?  Well, I'm sure there is more than meets the eye here.  There are reports of snipers shooting both the revolutionaries and Yanukovych so something's afoot.  But that's not the bother, it's the hypocrisy.  Not anything Russia's doing but "The West" my government included.

Now I'm sure that a lot of Westerners won't agree with me but consider this.  We are adamant that Russia must not annex Ukraine.  We are adamant that the Crimean government should not hold a referendum to decide it's own future.  We are adamant that it should remain a part of the Ukraine and Russian boots must not be on the ground there.

What do I have to say about that?  Kosovo!

Here's a part of another country, Serbia, where the majority of it's citizens were of another ethnicity.  Just like Crimea.  Here is a region where the ethnic majority decided for itself to secede from that country and choose it's own future.  Just like Crimea.  And The West supported the ethnic Albanians in their right to self determination and it is now recognised as an independent republic.

So why can't we recognise the majority ethnic Russians in Crimea right to self determination?  Remove all of the politics and hidden agendas that each nation has here, the basic principle is the same.  Two groups of people, who inhabit a region of a larger country and make up the majority of the ethnic population there, decided they wanted a different a different future.  One group we recognised, the other we've refused.

What I find particularly galling is that the region of Kosovo is considered historically by Serbs to be their homeland, where their people originated from.  During the Ottoman period Albanians moved into the region making up the majority population and in the present day broke away, with Western support, thus robbing Serbia a part of it's own land which was a part of it since Serbia came into existence.

Crimea however, has in contrast never been part of a Ukrainian homeland.  In fact, until the 20th century the majority of the population were Turkic with Armenian, Bulgarian and Greek minorities.  All relocated to central Asia by Stalin.  It was then that it was settled by Russians.  As a part of the Soviet Union the Crimean ASSR, succeeded by the Crimean Oblast, was always a part of Russia.  In 1954 Khrushchev, a Ukrainian, transferred the Crimea to The Ukrainian SSR to mark the anniversary of the Ukraine becoming a part of the Russian Empire.

I can't abide by the double standards of politicians and I'm sorry if you don't agree with me but on these two occasions I believe Russia has it right.  Kosovo should never have become independent, it'd be like Kent in England being settled by so many Eastern Europeans that they made up the majority population and then declared independence, it would never happen, and if the Crimean people vote in a referendum to join Russia, I genuinely don't have a problem with that.
1
1
Ben Coleman's profile photo
 
Yeah, works been cool.  I have to tear myself away some days I enjoy it that much.  I could be a real workaholic if I let myself be.

Not into politics eh?  We'll, if you give a damn about how much you pay for gas, LGBT rights or the amount of tax you pay, then you're into politics :-)

Good to hear from you babe.  I'll attend school again regularly soon Miss +Leslie Burke.  Promise x
 
Now, I'm not too big on conspiracy theories although I accept some.

I'm not a fan of the proxy war theory about Syria and that it was started by the USA influencing the rebels. I believe Syrians were caught up in the fervor of the Arab Spring and wanted political reform.

So with that in mind I do hope that the Syrian crisis is not forgotten now we have a crisis in Ukraine. I've seen before how 'smaller' conflicts that have been raging for a long time get sidelined when there's a political crisis taking place in a larger country where there may be more directly at stake for the traditional powers (Russia and NATO).

The conspiracy? The Ukrainian situation has provided Putin an opportunity to divert everyones attention away from Syria by invading Ukraine. The intervention wasn't necessary on Russia's part, certainly not on this scale if there was a genuine threat to ethnic Russians, and now NATO are all focused on this matter and Syria has hardly featured in the press.

Assad can go back to killing his own people safe in the belief that his erstwhile ally Vlad the by proxy Impaler has everyone focused elsewhere.

#peaceforsyria
#peaceforukraine
1
2
Smoshauna Ott's profile photoshaunamarie ott's profile photo
 
God bless you. Great post.
People
In his circles
77 people
Have him in circles
609 people
Work
Occupation
Financial Systems Administrator
Basic Information
Gender
Male
Story
Tagline
Socialist, revolutionary, republican
Bragging rights
Direct descendant of the Danish Vikings who settled in England and formed what was known as The Danelaw
Places
Map of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has lived
Currently
Hastings, United Kingdom
Links