Shared publicly  - 
 
A few people with the right information could make all the difference on Election Day. Check out GottaVote.org to make sure you and everyone you know are ready to cast a ballot: http://OFA.BO/9FEHsk
299
42
蓝夢幻中's profile photokent Hernandez's profile photoRowyn Peel's profile photoJonathan Simen's profile photo
382 comments
 
中国的建筑设计让我蛋疼,但是他们还要拼命地扯你的蛋。
Translate
王斐
 
前十,这个很好的一个功能就是可以编辑你曾经发表的东西。。
Translate
 
哇,这么靠前!
Translate
王斐
+
1
2
1
 
不错,比上次更近了,问大家个问题,热门信息跟你关注的人有关系吗?为什么都是些社会问题?
Translate
long su
 
奥总,求解放!
Translate
 
这里投票貌似不关我的事情 我这里投票貌似没我的事情
Translate
Translate
 
Remember, Republicans only win when voter turnout is low.
 
No pays no gays (= ̄ω ̄=)
萧海
 
求绿卡
 
+Joshua Bennett: Granted, my sample size is limited to elections I've been aware of, which are Oregon and Oklahoma elections within my lifetime. So, since Reagan destroyed the Republican Party with the neoconservative movement, what I suggested remains true.
季文
 
哈哈全是同胞呀
豆芽
 
来晚了吗??
Translate
 
哈哈 没票怎么办?
Translate
 
奧巴馬!軟蛋!
Translate
Vic Li
 
希望中国有一天和美国一样强大,包括民主
Translate
Translate
 
我也想提美国孩子们蛋疼一句…wtf 哈哈哈全是中国人!!
Translate
 
Why can't we vote for electors?
赵双
 
我来了,马马!!!爱你。。好基友!!!!
Translate
lynn hc
 
耶。。 闪人!
 
前100都算沙发,哈哈
Translate
王晨
 
◐▽◑...
豆芽
 
死死死死死死死死死死死死是
 
+Chuck Fresh: A better question is, now that the literacy rate is 90+%, why do we keep the Electoral College around? The whole point of it originally was so at least one person in the room when the vote went down knew how to read.
 
你怎么还好意思?!!!每年收这么多中国移民、中国学生;你就不怕红色间谍?!!!!!
Translate
 
观海同学会找CIA翻译留言吗?
Translate
 
好困,奥哥我睡觉去了。
Translate
 
+Paul Johnson Arizona State Attorney's trying something new other than their usual "turn away voters if they're not voting for GOP" method. He's now gone birther and doesn't want the POTUS to be on the AZ ballot because he wishes believes the POTUS was not born in Hawaii and needs more proof.
 
早上好!!!
 
+Sabeena LoBello: You'd think after two wars that it took the Democrats to finish, being wrong on the budget, wrong on human rights and wrongly valuing security over freedom, the Republicans would learn to pick their fights better. I guess we're just seeing the death spasms of a failed ideology.
 
观海同志你好我们胡总托我给你带句话这个月的党费说什么都不能再拖了请立即缴清 按期交纳党费,是每一个党员应尽的义务,也是对党员党性的检验,还请对按期缴纳党费的问题予以足够的重视(翻个墙不容易饿)
Translate
 
+Paul Johnson Just like their chickenhawk hero Bush 43, they have no exit strategery , obstruct everything the POTUS does, all because they hate him more than their self-proclaimed, patriotic selves love our nation.
 
please freedom to China
 
前一百。。。哥能顺便打听下,到底撕票了没?
Translate
 
+Paul Johnson voter turn out is almost always a reaction of the way people feel about things. 2008 is a prime example, people were mad at the way things were going in Washington, the economy was headed south, and the bank bailouts ruffled peoples feathers. +Barack Obama ran on change the way things ran and really got the youth vote in on the action, we were going to change the Washington establishment. 4 years later and the economy still sucks, Washington is ran the same way, and youth feel discouraged and don't care to vote once again.
 
菲律宾以及南海局势与你何关,请勿搅局,晚安,奥黑
Translate
熊師
 
我又来了
 
我就看看,带领草泥马观光团强势围观。
Translate
 
+Cynthia Inshuti: If you can't handle intelligence and verbosity, you should probably go back to Facebook. Otherwise, let the adults talk.
 
"A few people with the right information" why does that sound all wrong to me from a president who changes the meaning of the word "right" as suites him. http://goo.gl/XWHiA
 
+Paul Johnson I can blame them both for not working together. Neither branch of government works for the people anymore. The Obamacare act, majority of americans were against that act and house dems, senate dems, and obama forced it. I don't think many americans wanted more corporate bailouts but house dems, senate dems, and Obama gave those people more money. When Democrats lost the house in 2010 it was because of their extremely unpopular policies they put in place.
 
Well now that you advocate states rights shouldn't we be far more concerned with our state elections than national ones?
 
OI! speak ENGLISH! that at least half the people on GMAIL can comprehend
 
They don't realign from intellectual growth. They realign due to Corporate mandate. They are all bought and paid for. It couldn't be more obvious.
 
I'm registered! Had to re-register in order to vote for Freedom and Truth in the Republican Primaries. None of my friends can believe we're all Republicans now!

Ron Paul 2012
 
+Joshua Bennett: Why call it Obamacare when it was Romney's idea? We wanted universal healthcare, the Republicans wanted to subsidize the insurance industry. Giving the Republicans exactly what they wanted was the olive branch. The Democrats lost 2010 for doing exactly what they promised in 2008: Working with the Republicans. The problem is, Republicans aren't reasonable. Something that was reinforced with the new Republican majority that won't do anything in an effort to get stupid people to think it's Obama's fault.
 
+Cynthia Inshuti: This isn't Gmail, and it's not like English is the official language in this country, or even from this country. Why don't you speak Navajo?
 
+Cynthia Inshuti One, you are on google+ not Gmail. Two, google has a translation service at translate.google.com. Three, the internet is global, and as such, people from around the world have the ability to engage each other in communication in ways that were not previously possible. To demand that people in another country who are expressing their opinion on the politics of a country, must speak the language of that country, is ridiculous. If you want to go with that, then please speaking in Chinese when ever you talk about China, French when you speak about France, etc, etc. See how silly that would be?
 
If it means taking by force from another person it's not a RIGHT, it's theft! Healthcare is not a right as it involves the forced action of another person. Rights can only involve the inaction of other people because they have Rights too!!
 
+Cynthia Inshuti: That said, if the spam from China is bothering you, flag the spam, report and block the spamming profile. Voila, spam disappears.
 
+Chris Cecil: DERP!! Now say it in your own words instead of a Tea Party talking point if you're looking to sound like you know what you're talking about and have an educated opinion on the subject.
 
+Paul Johnson LOL, I understand the concept of Rights from my own study of history starting with Thomas Paine and John Locke. Maybe you should stop with the messenger attacks and speak to if you disagree with it or not.
 
+Paul Johnson Why do you feel you deserve to take by force the product of other people's labor? Are you special in some way that makes it correct for you to steal?
Translate
 
+Chris Cecil: If you're unhappy with the costs of living in a civilized society, maybe you should move to Somalia. No taxes, none of the benefits!
 
oh plz! go get a life....... i never said anything bout being unhappy bout the cost of wot eva the hell u talkin bout. OK!!!!!!!
 
The benefits of civilized society doesn't flow from money alone. it flows from rule of law. Where everyone is equal under the law and that law is based on human rights. They don't have that in Somalia...
 
Most of the taxes money taken from us isn't used to support those goals here either, sadly. It taken and given as gifts to the Obama and Romney's rich crony friends on wall street and some crumbs are thrown to the poor to keep them from rising up and fixing it. I don't want the crumbs. We the people baked the pie and we the people own the pie. It's ours to give voluntarily if we wish, but not taken by force!!
 
damn, never ever commenting on anything 2 do with politics and ish like that. PEACE!
 
+Chris Cecil Taxes are necessary for government to operate in a capitalistic system. If your argument is that taxation is theft, please explain how you wish to fund government. How those taxes are spent, and what rights are or aren't varies with the perception of the society. While I admire the fresh thinking that Paine and Locke brought to philosophy at the time, I would not say that everything they have written is currently relevant. Most developed nations have some sort of health-related benefits funded by the tax systems of their governments. I do not know if that is what the US needs or not, nor am I saying the bills recently proposed are the right solution for this country, however to claim that health benefits of some sort are a right would not be an unprecedented claim based on the current activities of some other governments in developed nations.
 
+Cynthia Inshuti ...you do realize this is a public discussion area and most of the comments have not been written to you specifically, right? Like the one about unhappiness you replied to was written in response to someone else; that's why it says their name at the start.
 
um...... of course i know that.- ok honestly, i didnt mean to offend any1. but this stuff is strangely interasting
 
Fuck ccp 打倒共匪
Translate
 
Victor Cypert you should look at more than one view point every action comes with a consequence.
 
+Meghan Sanders A very well reasoned and written response. Thank You. While, other countries do fund these things thru taxes I don't believe that applies here. Most other developed countries do not have governments based in respect for individual rights. In other words, they give their subjects certain privileges while in American based on our founding beliefs our citizens have rights that do not flow from the government but are innate. Rights do not vary based on society only their enforcement does. As for the taxes issue. 1. If the government stuck to it's legally defined roles it would cost so little it would not be hard to fund and 2. While I believe taxes are theft, there are trade-offs, Some taxes (not personal income taxes however, those are wrong) are needed, but we need to start that conversation on a base that stealing is bad and we must strive to minimize the damage. Business taxes or only Capital Gains taxes could fund the whole government if we wanted... Make money off just the fact that you have money (Capital Gains) I feel is immoral already, as you did not trade any labor for that money. Thus it wouldn't be wrong for the government to take a piece of that.
 
I agree with Daniel McDonald's comment...President Obama managed to prevent America from going into chaos just in one term...If Republicans didn't block reforms he intended to implement, there could have been huge progress for America.
高昂
 
我准备用这几天毕业设立做翻译的空荡,用自己不靠谱的英语给美国包大人留言,让他关注下g+上的中国大陆居民~~~
Translate
 
好的玩简体中文滴
Translate
 
+Chris Cecil Government in developed countries generally costs more as the country does better financially as the expectations of the quality of life of the citizens rises. Things like public roads, for example, require more sophisticated maintenance in a more developed nation, than in a country which doesn't create roads, or only creates dirt roads, for a simplified example. Compared to models which examine the financial success of a country, and the taxation that is required to upkeep that standard of living, American taxes are actually remarkably low for the affluence and level of social development of the country. I think it would be... extremely difficult to cut personal income tax out of the picture, and still be able to support the government at the expected level of the population. I believe that we could certainly stand to reform the tax system, however eliminating sources of revenue when we are already outspending our income seems like a difficult choice to justify.
Captiol Gains are tricky. I would argue that someone who makes an investment, has indeed worked for that money. It's not manual labor; instead it's intellectual labor. Either way, taxation provides benefits to all of the citizens. If someone earns money outside of a corporation, and uses those services, shouldn't they be responsible for helping to contribute to those services? I mean, going back to roads. Businesses aren't the only people using roads... and I would think that funding a government entierly through business could be rather risky for the people. If the government gets all of it's money from business, wouldn't it be best served if it then did everything it could to please and continue business? While in an ideal society that wouldn't be the case, I feel that, as human beings, we often fall into that sort of trap of catering to that which benefits us over that which needs us.
 
3 reasons why i wont vote for him
1. im republican]
2. im under 18
3. i live in england and not america
 
So, how do you figure the government does not need that much money? We are already trillions in the hole. But, we should probably just do away with the governments source of income. Really?
We have the lowest taxes in decades right now. How's that working? Are you seeing the money trickle down? No.
How would you suggest we fund help for the poor? Help for the disabled? Charity? Yeah right. That is what was tried before we (and other countries) started government run assistance. The same thing happened then as would now. We would have the rich, and the poor. The rich didn't get that way by being charitable. They just didn't. Part of the libertarian platform is also to deregulate businesses, so we would effectively put ourselves in the position of being at the mercy of our new corporate masters. I'm sure they will be fair though right? If not, what are you going to do? There is none of those pesky "entitlement programs" in your utopia. You suck it up and sing 16 tons. At least now if we don't like how things are being run, we can vote them out. But, I bet the company store will let us do that too.
The Libertarians utopia is a dream. What we need is a nice balance between libertarian and socialism. That is the only way the do it. One keeps the other in check, because if either become too dominant we're screwed.
 
你好呀 总统先生
Translate
 
I Voted for You the 1rst time, and 2nd !
 
Or don't. You'll probably all vote for someone stupid.
 
+Meghan Sanders I think your glossing over where the vast majority of the federal government money goes. It isn't all for roads! Which should be a state matter not a federal matter, but that's another topic. The vast majority of our Federal money goes to illegal wars and social spending that should be handled at the state level, if at all. These should be our focus, we cut those out and things will start to get better. Those two things are like 70% or something!! Rememeber every level the money has to travel means more money to useless bueracrats and less to really use for the problem. I'm not against some of this stuff per say, but the power to do them is not given to the Federal Government for a very good reason!

+chris conway Trickle down is keynesian Bull**. Hayek is the correct economic school of thought!
 
好玩呀 总统大人 你玩通宵不
Translate
 
From my understanding health care reform was trying to decrease the average cost of health care for all in the U.S.. Right now if someone with absolutely no money or health insurance of any sort walks into an emergency room with a medical concern, then they have to be treated. Who pays for that treatment? It comes to the rest of the population in the form of increased costs of healthcare. While I don't think the healthcare overhaul did enough, it was a start in a much needed change of direction.
 
お休みなさい! オバマちゃん
♪───O(≧∇≦)O────♪
Translate
 
I don't really care who wins but I think it's a bad idea to want to reinstate pre-existing conditions, lifetime limits, and kicking the younger generation to the curb by denying them access to their parents health plans. Lets literally FREE UP business capital with a nationalized health plan, that way businesses can spend their money on salaries and supplies....it's the most pro business health care plan that can exist.
 
Will do.... You go barack
 
Health care will still have to be paid for somehow, and with the amount of debt the country is currently in a single payer system of healthcare will mean a large increase in taxes in order for it to work. This is the crux of the economic discussion, how do we pay for everything that the government provides. Republicans say spend less and tax less, democrats say tax more to increase income to meet spending requirements.
 
OBAMA... PRESIDENT OF THE U.S. 2012!!!
 
能给你留言是我莫大的荣幸,就在刚刚喔花了两分钟下载了google+,花了一分钟注册。三分钟发现了您的主页。于是我留言可。亲,不到十分钟的时间我可以对一个国家的领导人说的话很直接的评论了,而且强势插入。厚嗨森啊。。
Translate
 
+Chris Cecil I was using roads as a simplistic example, since government spending is pretty complex. Could it stand to be reformed? absolutely. However, spending what money we do have poorly, versus spending it in a more beneficial way, doesn't change the cost of government, per say. It changes how much is wasted, yes. However, we are not earning enough money as a government, to meet the budgeting needs of the country even if we spent the money properly. So, if we are grossly mismanaging our money now, then it would mean that we are likely failing to meet the needs of the people. Meeting those needs through better financial management would not necessarily reduce the cost of government, since it's already operating at a loss, and not properly meeting all of those needs as it is. If it were simply meeting those needs inefficiently, then you could correct the inefficiencies and save money, but that's not the case at the moment. Even if we correct our spending to meet what you consider to be necessary, modeling of the costs, show that our income isn't currently high enough to support it.
 
我是美国人,可是我在大学学中文了。I am an american, but I studied Chinese in college.
 
Dave Hardee, howabout just a bit of both over a decade, just to get a balanced budget? If people think we're actually in a real war now, wait until we're in a REAL war...when people actually fight back....our offense budget (I mean defense budget....) is way too high. More needs to go into r&d instead of actual existing supply.

And if you seriously think we'll pay back the debt, then you must be living on mars. We'll never pay it back beyond balancing the budget. We'll have another war and likely another Marshall plan before we pay anyone back...but I suppose it's a good talking point for people that actually believe government budgets with the reserve currency are equivalent to our family budgets.

If living in America has taught me one thing, its that contract were MADE to be BROKE.
 
+Jimbo Rizza I know that we probably will not pay off the debt anytime soon, but having worked in the government I recognize the large amount of unnecessary overhead that much of our taxes gets spent on. I do think it is possible to clean up government, but like it has been stated before special interests and corporate influence will need to be brought under control first.
 
+Dave Hardee Honestly, I think, realistically, the solution is going to be somewhere in the middle. We spend too much, and we tax too little. We've been trying to live in a "everyone wins" state for too long. We have to raise taxes, and cut and reorganize spending. It's not magic; it's a math equation. A huge, complex one with a lot of charged feelings, sure. But at the end of the day, really, it comes down to making both sides (spending and income) match in a way that provides the most useful benefits for the people, with the least financial strain.
 
Still no one talks about the HUGE war spending. That is the big thing putting us in the poorhouse. 4 years ago, it was all democrats cared about. Now, not so much. Strange...
 
gov't spending grows at a rate twice that of the growth of the economy, a few percent, in what is considered a good year, let's not even talk about a bad year. That's not sustainable, you want to raise taxes every year? When exactly will you realize thats retarded? 90%? 99%? will you care, after all, the ones of you supporting higher taxes will be soaking up my money and living for free so you won't care I should imagine so you will never wake up.

Get your hands off my money and get a job.
 
It's hard to get jobs when you cut all the spending in the market place +Derek Garnett . Spending should be cut in good times, in bad times, it just sends the economy in a downward spiral.

You can either have taxes or a job then, you don't get both.
 
The more people get out and vote, the better chance we will be rid of the Obama curse.
 
Gov't spending? Keynsian economics has failed in every application in history and has spiralled many economies, Greece and Spain most recently, into complete and utter violence fueled melt down.

You are categorically wrong +Kate Childers
 
+Derek Garnett: It's the economy, stupid! Fix the economy and revenues go up. And by "fix," I don't mean "more shit-level retail work and waiting tables" jobs, I mean "real, family wage jobs Americans are proud of." Keep in mind we also had a substantially more progressive tax structure in the 1950s if you're looking back to the "good ole days" of our economy.
 
+Kate Childers More keynesian bull**. Read some Hayek and come back when you understand economics. I suggest "Economics in one lesson" short easy read. You can find it free online.
 
+Derek Garnett LOL, Keynsian economics worked quite well. Every time the spending was cut, it stopped working. Try actually reading history rather than crap by right wing web sites.

And if you didn't notice, the austerity measures are sending Greece into a tailspin down. Now there are huge numbers of homeless people. Even the Germans are getting that it is doing exactly the opposite.

What, are you backwards man?
 
怎么学好英语啊
Translate
 
好好学习,天天向上
Translate
 
"austerity" is not the problem in greece. The problem is the cheap-money central bank boom that happened before the bust. If "everytime the spending was cut it stopped working" and the spending is debt, how do you propose we ever get out of debt to the bankers that print all that money?
 
+Paul Johnson the good old days of the 1950's... Right, because the fact that every industrialized nation on the planet was a smoking, bombed out ruin except for ourselves had nothing to do with that prosperity, it was all the ridiculous taxes and out of control spending, right you got me.

We grew in spite of those tax rates and spending programs and didn't care because we had money coming out of our ears. That period was what caused the ignorant ideas of the left today, based in completely ignoring WWII and it's impact on our culture and economy and assuming that we can tax the crap out of our people and spew federal tax dollars on anything under the sun and it's justified some how.
 
+Chris Cecil a depression is a lack of spending - just exactly how do you cure a lack of spending by sharply cutting spending by the largest entity in the entire country?

duh!
 
Hahaha - I love it - 'ignorant ideas of the left' - +Derek Garnett how about some less than pure hot air from you and then maybe we can take you seriously.
 
+Kate Childers ... so if every time the spending was cut it stopped working, what then is your solution? For the government to constantly and increasingly spend money until it owns the entire economy and we are all federal employees? That's your grand solution? That's the problem with Gov't spending, unless it never ends and always increases at an accelerating rate the illusion cannot be maintained, inflation goes out of control and the economy tanks.... Its really simple, its just as idealistic, short-sighted and ignorant as communism... nice thought but 100% totally impossible.
 
+Kate Childers Read "economics in one lesson" It's a quick easy read. It's explained very well.
 
+Derek Garnett: So you probably think we succeeded economically after WWI depsite the New Deal, too, eh? Damn you're retarded.
BAG GAB
 
+Kate Childers I consider myself a Keynesian, but I'm starting to wonder why this is a perpetual state. I would have thought this would be only for a crisis, such as we have now.

For the record; I'm for massively redirecting US military budget to the home front. For getting US out of this hole.
 
It will take a combination of many unpleasant things, like increasing taxes AND decreasing spending as +Meghan Sanders and others have stated. Regulation is not as evil as some make it out to be as well, so long that it is executed efficiently.
 
Um +Derek Garnett no, a push for spending is during a recession to spark the economy back to where it is running on it's own and people have confidence and jobs to keep spending, you cut spending when it is not a recession.

Try actually reading how Keynesian works.
 
The way to crush the middle class is between the two milestones of taxation and inflation- Lennon
 
+B Gallagher has started down the road to no longer being a Keynesian. It always starts with a question like that! Try to find the awnser, my friend!! You'll come around...
 
+Chris Cecil I'm not going to buy a book. I've read a lot of libertarian economic fantasies. None of them make sense. It's downright amazing the gibberish they come up with.
 
+John Heyrich: The conservatives pushing for a lack of import tariffs, driving inflation and shifting as much of the tax burden as possible to the middle class definitely seems to be accomplishing their goals of destroying America's middle class...
BAG GAB
 
+Chris Cecil don't count on me...I know where the bodies are buried.
 
Kate O your mean when you are in mass over debt you just borrow more when you can see the economic wind blowing in the world. whats wrong with no debt ?
 
the only one that can change it is you, vote and if you don't vote you have no reason to complain
 
+Kate Childers "a depression is a lack of spending - just exactly how do you cure a lack of spending by sharply cutting spending by the largest entity in the entire country?"

You really should pick up an economics text...No, its not, a depression is an economy that is shrinking in size, this does not have to be form a lack of spending, it is most commonly due to devaluation of currency through inflation, which is what government spending actually causes.

The price of milk literally went up more than 10 cents the minute each stimulus package was passed. Why? Inflation.

It is not the governments job to spend money for the sake of spending money. In fact, the government was never actually supposed to even have any money of it's own... The money it does have it stole from it's citizenry. Simply giving it back would make the citizenry spend it, and they spend it better, on things that benefit them instead of things that a politician thinks that we should think should benefit us in so far as it makes us vote for him.
 
+Richard Harwood when in depression, you either get masses of people with no jobs and hanging around having to commit crimes to live. So it's either debt or a moving economy. Those debts are not nearly as important as an economy that isn't throwing a huge percentage of people into homelessness.
 
The art of economics consists in looking not merely at the immediate but at the longer effects of any act or policy; it consists in tracing the consequences of that policy not merely for one group but for all groups.

This fallacy you are using is very simple. You only look at the groups the government GIVES the money too, but you ignore the groups the government TAKES the money from. If the government lowers spending then the people they took it from spend it and thus OVERALL spending amounts don't change only where it is spent. I think a million people spending their money as they see fit makes for a stronger economy then one guy in DC deciding for us.
 
+Derek Garnett There several types of economic texts - some read like fantasies, others actually work.

It's the government's job to handle the interests of people as a group, not the interests of the rich and powerful who get rich and richer during those periods of income inequality - so rich that they throw the economy out of balance. Now they can either spend money or have to get it taxed out of them. Since it's not their job to make the whole economy better, they usually opt for having to get taxed, even though they aren't smart enough to know it.

This entire fiasco was set off because of the Bush tax cuts and the removal of banking regulations for the benefit of Wall street.

Its in the long term interest for the country to be on an even keel, not to be debt free. You don't right a boat that's sinking by drilling holes in the bottom.
 
Oh no. This is going to start a troll riot. Brace yourselves democrats!
 
+Chris Cecil It's not a million people spending their money as they see fit, it'a lot of rich corporations getting their govenment services for nothing and a lot of little people paying it for them and getting less and less all the time.

So you give the money to the poor, who have to spend it rather than give it to the rich who stick it in their bank accounts and don't even say thank you.
 
couple facts you don't seem to be aware of +Kate Childers

1) We are not in a depression, we are in a recession...Depression = nagative growth rate, Recession = low or 0 growth rate. There is a HUGE difference. Educate yourself before spouting.

2) Our government doesn't have any money to spend. We have a national debt greater than our GDP. What money should we spend exactly?

3) The economy is in bad shape precisely because of government intervention and the failed policies of this president. We lost some 3-4 billion dollars in tax revenue last year alone because he won't give work visa's to students that he gives free tuition to come to our schools and then kicks them out of our country. This was one of his campaign platforms, cheaper education through subsidy for anyone in the world and fewer work visa's for foreigners. Please tell me how that is not completely and totally retarded. Prime example of how THIS president caused the problem and continues to exacerbate it.
 
I know +kent Hernandez I keep trying to educate them to see the obvious and they are just determined to run this country into the ground so they can save a few bucks on their taxes today. talk about short term goals.
 
+Chris Cecil There are just as many government programs for the rich as there are for the poor, and chances are everyone calling for spending cuts have benefited from such programs. The programs for the poorer of the nation are simply more easy to see. Think about home owner tax credits and others which may be a little harder to see.
 
These fiasco was set off by endless money printing at the Federal Reserve. Bush didn't help and I didn't support him. But the bottom line is the Boom and Bust cycle is caused by inflating the money supply. Everything else is a branch. But the FED is the root!
 
LOLOLOLOL - +Derek Garnett spouting the crap I see.

No no no no

Yes, it's a recession - a lack of spending. What the f did you think a recession was? Greece has a depression.

Our government makes money dear. It's not like it's going to run out.

This president has saved your sorry a*** from what the republican was planning to do and what the tea partiers would love to do - learn economics the hard way.
 
homeowner tax credits?!?!?! You ahve to be kidding +Dave Hardee ... Show me the rich person who gives two shits about 8 grand, lol....
 
+Chris Cecil if that was the problem we would be in inflation.

And yes, Bush ess the pooch big time.
 
+Dave Hardee I agree with that!!! The rich are sucking at the government teat WAY more than the poor. Which is why I believe cutting off that teat will HELP the poor comparively
 
Then get educated on the issues. Followed closely by how to vote to end the craziness of this administration! Please don't cast a vote of ignorance. 
 
There is inflation!! The problem is much of the inflated money is going straight into the pockets of the rich and they are not spending it yet. It has to slosh around in the economy before you'll see it in price increases. Look at the increase in the money supply to measure inflation not the increase in prices. That and the government stats on inflation is bull cause they keep changing the length of the ruler but still calling it a 12"
 
The 1% pay 37% of all federal taxes collected. The top 5% pay 56%. Where in those numbers are the rich not carrying this country?
 
They also own and operate the businesses that employ the rest of us. They make more because they are worth more. They are worth more because they contribute more to society.
 
"A few people with the right information could make all the difference on Election Day."

And of course, the "right information" is how to rig the election.
 
+Joshua Bennett It seems to me that Voter Turnout has allot to do with Election Results ... or at least the Republicans seem to think it had allot to do with Obama's success. That's why they are eliminating Voter's Rights by demanding Photo ID's and messing with Vote Machine Software etc.
Furthermore, the only reason so many (but not a majority) of people are against Obama's Health Care Bill, is because they know very few of the facts. This is primarily because they have been fed a pile of Lies by Republicans and Fox News. However, recently a Poll was conducted in which citizens were asked questions based on the Facts about Healthcare. In this case, the large majority (82% or 87% .. I can't remember which .. but I'm willing to find out and report back) were all for "Obamacare". Almost all were surprised to learn the facts and ultimately supported the Bill.
PS> Obama ran (in part) on Health Care ... albeit on Healthcare for ALL ... which is partly why he won the '08 Election. He will win again in 2012 for the same reasons. Besides, smart people can see what is going on in Congress. Democrats (especially Obama) have "compromised" so many times, almost to their own detriment, and Republicans have done ZERO. They haven't even created a single job even though that is precisely what "they" ran on in 2010.
Obama for 4 More Years ... Ya Baby !
 
The middle class are just the workers, they do not bear the tax burden although what they do pay hurts them more relatively... We were talking about taxes, not relative impact of paying them by volume of the class of people we are discussing.

Yes, without the middle class there would be no rich people either. The middle class benefit the most from lower taxes, those are who I am trying to defend. Leave their employers alone too.
 
And how much of the total income do the 1 percent make?
 
+Derek Garnett but they are not hiring if there is no buying and if you don't have money in the bottom, there isn't going to be buying. They aren't stupid.
 
People who vote - control the outcome. People who don't, have no say at all.
 
+Dave Hardee true, shouldnt' give it to them. To say they benefit though is a stretch, that's just more gov't wasting my money. The rich do not benefit from gov't spending beyond maybe roads and keeping criminals off the streets to the degree that's actually done, so that people will come to their businesses.

+Kate Childers I will look, I have seen those numbers but cant seem to find them right off...and the proportions don't match, the 1% does not earn 37% of GDP themselves, the vast majority of money earned and spent in the economy is done by the middle class and lower upper, those making 100k-200k household, which don't qualify as the 1%.... the 1% is a very few people.

They have a right to the money they earned. They earned it.

The spending done by the lowest income brackets does not spur the economy. That is subsistence spending. The middle class spending drives the economy. They are not spending because they are terrified of what Obama will do next, because of out of control gov't debt and because of things like rising gas prices and economic uncertainty.

deregulate, stop spending, stop taxing, shrink gov't, incentivize businesses to come to this country, stop kicking out people we pay to educate that are not citizens, stop homorhaging money at special interests and gov't programs and start empowering people. The economy will grow. It's so simple.
 
Legalize cannabis for medicinal, recreational and industrial uses.
 
I have plenty to say Kate and will continue to do so. Just don't follow the media masses like you obviously do. 
 
+Derek Garnett Why do you think they have a right to free government services? You think the big corporations they have their money invested in don't use harbors, roads, national and local security, court systems, educated population to employ, and all kinds of other things to make their money off of? Heck, with a bunch of freebies like that, I too could make a bunch of money - but I have to pay 40 percent of what I make to pay for them.

Don't be silly - they don't deserve it any more than you do. They don't work any harder, they just are less likely to care about who they step on to get their money.
 
Nobody is shutting you up +Skeeter Dickson but it takes votes to put someone in office and if you don't vote, then someone else gets that power.
 
Google translate first Chinese comment: "Chinese architectural design of egg hurt, but they are also hard to pull your eggs." +Meghan Sanders , does Google translate help you understand this? It is my opinion that responses should be posted in the language used in the original posting. Sorry, +Paul Johnson , but I'm not going to try to make any postings here in Navajo. :)
 
Oh, also, the original post here, Democrats trying to get as many people registered as possible.... You know why? And someone mentioned that Republicans only win when turnout is low? relatively low, yes, probably true. Want to know why?

The people in this country who work, earn and contribute to society already vote, for local, state and national elections, and always have and they are predominantly right of center.

The people who sit around complaining about not getting enough free shit, going to protests and living in their parents basement who have never voted before and will only vote in the presidential election because an Acorn or MoveOn.org hawker convinced them it was cool and that Democrats will give them free shit, this people also have no job, or are low income, uneducated(art history degrees don't count as educated) and generally don't actually care about politics, those people are way off on the left and they swing elections in the favor of democrats everytime.
 
Kate adding fuel to the fire is not ever going to put the fire out. why not stop printing money and bailing out all the foreign central banks and stop giving out our money to other countries then cut all biz tax to the lowest in the world and attract manufacturing back to the USA. along with total reduction of all GOV. Pay-outs to any and all by 10% total re-negotiate of all union retirement and health plans.
 
Um, I was complaining about having to pay for someone else's free shit that you think he earns.

But hey, feel free to totally make up what I was talking about if it makes you feel good.
 
And the general population is actually left of center dear.
 
+Richard Harwood: We don't want to attract companies that value cut-rate labor. That's what India and China are for. In America, we value quality over quantity. That's our selling point. Catering to the greedy is a great way to sell out our values to the lowest bidder.
 
+Richard Harwood how are you going to cut taxes on the big corporations to less than zero?

I guess that didn't work so well, eh?
 
control the illegal workforce with e-verify and set rules that give extra break for co. with fair pay standards.
 
I'm voting for MITT ROMNEY, So you can slither away back to indonesia or kenya or chicago for all I care. Bye-Bye!!!
 
+Richard Harwood: Better idea: Rather than victimizing the direct victims of undocumented labor further, remove the incentive: Minimum mandatory jailtime for people who hire workers that don't have authorization to work in this country. Nobody moves to another country illegally if they know they can't get paid.
 
总统先生好 请不要插手亚洲这点事 你们太能搅浑水了
Translate
 
Offender is not victim they choose to come and steal our jobs by crossing the border and offering to work for less. But by all means put the teeth in the law and give 1yr in jail to all biz owners and illegals for working in harmony to rip off the American people.
 
+Richard Harwood they choose to try to survive by going where they can get paid and support their families.

What, you think they aren't human?
 
So what its illegal and it takes away from the job pool and reduces wages thus lowering standards of living for Americans. Let the Mexicans fix their country with a revolution instead of causing a problem for USA Citizens.
 
总统,解就我们
Translate
 
Boycott the vote! The federal government is an extorting JOKE!
 
Vote out all incumbents they have screwed it up long enough.
 
Yeah, put in new incumbents to do exactly the same thing
 
+Richard Harwood: Wow, that was a little bit racist, given that Canadian illegal immigrants outnumber Mexican illegal immigrants in the US 2:1. But either way, they wouldn't be in the US if someone wasn't paying them. Jail the employers hiring illegals and you kill two birds with the same stone, without having to spend cash on deporting folks.
 
+Jerel Lorenzo: If you don't like to vote, then perhaps you should move to one of those third world dictatorships where the decision is made for you.
BAG GAB
 
+Paul Johnson ya, I wasn't following the Internationalist thread either...
 
I suggest cutting military budget, raising taxes on the rich so that there is a kind of limit to the Net salary anyone can get, giving those taxes to more arts education in schools, become more environmentally friendly on a national level, and encouraging home grown food whenever possible. But I'm just a kid, so why would the "older and wiser" people listen to me? sigh
 
Paul not racist but , and where did you get that 2 to 1 fact of illegals from Canada verse Mexican?
 
观海同学,求绿卡~
Translate
 
To everyone, you have to have an unemployment rate, otherwise we're severely screwed. Unfortunately we can't have too many unemployed otherwise we have another problem. It's all a balancing act ladies and gentlemen. Take a course on economics, and politics will make so much more sense.
 
+Richard Harwood I googled this really quick to find an article because I can't remember where the ones my friends in GA sent me were, so I'm not sure if it's the best source, but illegal immigrants aren't usually "stealing American jobs". They are doing the jobs that Americans think are not worth doing. There are jobs in the US, that we can't fill. Harvesting blueberries is one of them. No one wants to do it. The hours suck, the job sucks, and the profit margin is too low to pay what most Americans think they would deserve for that level of exhausting labor in the sun. Try telling your average unemployed guy in a city that you want him to go pick blueberries in the south for minimum wage, and see if he wants the job. The answer is usually "no". http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/georgias-new-immigration-law-leading-to-crops-rotting-in-farmers-fields/
 
+Richard Harwood: US ICE's statistics. Because it's more cost effective and gets better results to just jail the employers. Illegal immigrants will pay for their own trip home.
 
+Meghan Sanders: In Indian Country, it's typically white teenagers doing it. At least that's who I saw in the fields of Oklahoma. Surprised the hell out of me coming from Oregon!
 
I'm voting for Mitt Romney. Obama is clueless. He has raised the debt out of sight. He doesn't have any idea how to work with China so it's beneficial to our country as well. Romney has a sensible plan. Obama thinks the war on terror is over. REALLY? I rest my case
 
试试能不能发
Translate
 
+Harry Downs: Congratulations on falling for the "do nothing and blame Obama for nothing getting done" tactic the Senate Republicans pulled. Did you know they took "gullible" out of the Wiktionary?
Translate
 
奥总,天朝的事要多上心
Translate
 
+Harry Downs you think Romney has a sensible plan? Um, what? how why? Can you pin the man down for 2 minutes on anything?
 
Victor Cypert (hope I spelled it right) I thought your comments on disco era was funny (good joke)
 
希望胡总向你学习也开通g十
Translate
 
Kate Childers. Do you even have any idea what Romney stands for? Ot are you going by what you hear from others? I know what he stands for. I did my homework. I hope you did yours. I am only asking. It didn't sound like you know what he stands for. That I don't understand. 
 
Why all the Chinese... Is China voting in our November election?
 
No, Harry, they just don't have manners.
 
Not according to three different bios he approved. Born in Kenya. He wanted people to believe he was born there at some time in his life, now he doesn't. I don't know the truth, but he put out both stories. 
 
Oh I'm gonna be one of those people that makes a difference. NOBAMA-2012!!!!!!
 
I dont believe in what you stand for at all, so my vote is definitly going to Mitt. :p
 
OMG THE PERSIDENT HAS A GOOGLE+ PAGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sorry, exuse me :)
 
It appears the Chinese folks like Obama. They're all over this site. Do they know something we don't? 
 
Hi Kevin B. Not sure what you mean. Not sure I want to. Let's try to keep civil discussion. I have many friends who are democrat and many who are republican. I have strong beliefs. But we are all in this together. Your probably a good guy. I find it disturbing when people get so angry over issues. Not accusing just saying
 
Paul Johnson, last I checked Obama's party - the Democrats have controlled the Senate ever since Obama is President. It appears to be a SMALL detail you seem to have overlooked. The first two years of Obama the Democrats controlled everything.. It has been a long time (years) since the Democrat controlled Senate has even passed a budget. What are we paying them for? So who is gullible? The Republicans can't be blamed like you suggest they don't control the Senate. So sorry
 
Megan: I know first hand that all the construction workers in the USA that lost their jobs to illegals (including my self) would say that since the 80's we have been replaced by cheaper illegal workers ($50,000.oo a year plus jobs). Also fast-food joint used to be jobs for teens but no more. To the landscape profession was and is taken away from citizens. Nanny,Maids,cooks ,delivery person,trash-man,waiter,waitress,pool-cleaner,and on and on I can go. It NOT just farm labor that was stolen. You have listened to MSNBC to long.
 
+Harry Downs: You missed the last two years, then, or the first two when the Democrats let the Republicans have what they wanted. Congratulations on the memory loss and bad fact checking.
 
Paul: double dose the problem and make sure all suffer the full penalty of the laws current and future. make all worker abide by the rules as well as get those cheating bizmen, whats wrong with that ? GET THEM BOTH not only one side of problem !
 
Who do you think is going to be the president next?

(I'm voting for you)
BAG GAB
+
1
2
1
 
+Paul Johnson I note these guys are still working the "why hasn't he worked miracles" argument. Hey, he made that basket shot from mid-court and he caught Osama; it's homerun time!
Translate
 
Just make difference with the majority, nothing useful.
赵潞
 
奥哥,求解放啊!
Translate
有糖
 
嗷爸妈,能给中国广大男屌丝们都介绍个美国妞不,我们太需要女人了,中国性别比例严重失调!
Translate
 
Paul Johnson. I guess you think the Republicans wanted Obama Care? The Republicans couldn't stop a thing the first two years. The Democrats head a stranglehold on the government. Look at the disaster they have caused. Out government is beyond bankrupt 
 
+Richard Harwood: Why spend money on a problem that will fix itself if we take care of the root cause, and won't be a PR clusterfuck?
 
Good point Paul. but the deterrent value would stop things cold. you get what you pay for in all things.
 
Paul Johnson. Iran is in the process of putting missiles on bases in Venezuela. Chavez is building a partnership with Iran. These missiles will be able to hit US cities. What is Obama doing about it? Oh, my mistake, that's the Republicans fault. Obama was giving them what they wanted. I forgot Democrats don't do anything wrong. They just give the Republicans whatever they want so they get the blame.

Fat chance. I don't remember the Democrats ever being bi-partisan. Their definition of that term is for Republicans to surrender to what Democrats want. You sure have bought in to what they feed you. Forget facts
BAG GAB
 
Don't go after the low hanging fruit...Romneycare.
 
I am not enslaved to Romneycare. I lost my insurance because of Obamacare!!!
 
Hey Paul, typical response. Change the subject when in checkmate
 
Absence of war,world peace.
和平共处,我投您一票。
 
+Harry Downs: Clearly you weren't paying attention to who was pushing for Romneycare instead of single payer healthcare. Projectionism doesn't make what you said any more true. Sorry you're a dolt.
 
And, either way, it all Idontreallyhavetocare.
 
早安;凱道上的台灣勇士!假日辛苦嗆馬,雖未能參與,但我心長伴你側! [emo56]
Translate
 
Dear President Obama,

You speak of a few people with the right information being important on election day.

I could not agree more.

And with that thought in mind, here is a speech I have written for you to give to the American public. It will give the right information to the right people—the American people—so they will know what to do on election day.

We, the people, elected you as our president. We elected you because we believed you when you promised us that government would be more transparent under your tenure, and that you'd protect medical marijuana patients. Those promises you have broken so far, but it isn't too late to make good on them.

We no longer believe you are honest, or that you are in office to protect United States citizens.

This speech could be the beginning of a change.

This speech could get you the respect back that you need to be worthy of being re-elected!

Do you really want to be re-elected just because you're the least worst scoundrel on the ballot?


______________________________________________________
What_I_Wish_Were_Barack_Obama's_Re-Election_ Speech_
______________________________________________________

Today I have a statement.

A very simple and powerful statement—short, sweet, and simple.

Marijuana is not a dangerous drug with no medical benefits and it does not belong *any*where on the DEA's classified drug list.

I know it is true.

Most of you know that is true, by now.

The United States Government knows it is true.

The DEA knows it is true.

Now, the entire world will know that I, President Obama, am willing to state that these facts are true. I am willing to state facts that are quite obvious to most people, including the government of Portugal, which has legalized all drugs, including Cannabis, with great success and this has resulted in a lowering of the crime rate, even!

This is the beginning of the true era of my giving you a transparent government, and the truth.

Now, that was the short, sweet, and simple version.

[laughter]

Now here's the more complicated part.

The plant known in the scientific and botanical communities as Cannabis is not now, and never was a dangerous drug. It is not now, and never has been, without medical benefits.

Even that entity known colloquially as Big Pharma, i.e., the very large pharmaceutical companies, know these facts. They also know that Cannabis is cheap to grow and would replace many of their dangerous and costly prescription drugs were it to be legalized. They have billions to spend on smear campaigns spreading lies and rumors about marijuana, lobbyists in all elected forms of governing bodies, and buying your politicians to ensure that the drug laws stay the way they are even though they know how spurious the claim that it should be illegal is. This in spite of the fact that over 300,000 people died taking those pharmaceutical companies' very same legal prescription drugs last year alone. This in spite of the fact that no one has ever died from the use of marijuana. Medical researchers have, in times past, tried to find a benchmark for an overdose and gave up in despair, as no how high the amount given, the animals they were testing never overdosed!

As a matter of fact, medical research the world over is discovering cannabis receptors all over the human body, most prominently in the digestive tract and in the brain! Our bodies were made to utilize the substances in Cannabis. That is why this drug works so well with people with digestive problems, the complications of chemotherapy for cancer, and for many mental illnesses, to name just a few! These studies are being done overseas, very little here in the United States because of the illegitimate, draconian, and among the more enlightened, very outmoded drug laws we have in force in this country. The United States medical world is ready to start some serious research, the second that is made legal. That is why there are many patents already being applied for in the United States Patent Office for specific parts of the active parts of both Cannabis sativa and Cannabis indica.


The fact of the matter is that Cannabis should never have been outlawed in the first place!

The plant was illegitimately made a Class 1 drug some time around 1937. It was never based on scientific fact, let alone simple medical fact! One of the biggest driving forces behind this plant being placed on the Class 1 drug schedule was from William Randolph Hearst and his huge conglomerate paper, newspaper, and printing company, due to the cheap paper produced from hemp, and the fact that the newspaper businesses did not wish to have to compete their wood pulp paper against the hemp paper, because they were already committed to using wood pulp paper, and did not want to spend the money to change over to hemp paper, in spite of the fact that it is easier to grow, quicker to grow, cheaper to grow, and more environmentally friendly to grow. That's the fact behind the push right now to legalize growing hemp as an agricultural product, and getting nowhere with the federal government, in spite of the fact that the Cannabis sativa raised for paper doesn't have the THC levels in it that the medical Cannabis does.

Also on the side of keeping the drug illegal is the entire United States for-profit penal system. The for-profit prison system has lobbyists in Washington buying every one of our representatives that they can with election money so Congress will keep marijuana drug laws on the books. The United States criminal justice and prison system is dedicated to making as much money as possible by keeping it illegal. The prison system profits financially from those lives being destroyed! Lives are destroyed on a daily basis by this failed war on drugs! People are being arrested because of the innocent use of a plant that has been used by humans before we even started writing history down on clay tablets or papyrus scrolls. The use of Cannabis could even predate the domestic production of beer and wine! All this information was never spread about by those who made the substance illegal! No one asked the United States citizens to vote on the subject! It took a constitutional amendment to get rid of Prohibition, and I'm working on making sure that whatever it takes, I will do it to ensure that the people of this country are safer than they are now from their very own government. I will now, if I may, quote Wikipedia: "The repeal movement was started by a wealthy Republican, Pauline Sabin, who said that prohibition should be repealed because it made the US a nation of hypocrites and undermined its respect for the rule of law." Right now, the same can be said for the prohibition of marijuana. I pledge to do everything I can to change this to align with the will of the citizens of this country, instead of those with the vested interest in making more money from the persecution and incarceration of innocent people by keeping marijuana a Class 1 Schedule drug.

I hear your anguish at the loss of the legitimacy of this government. This is the beginning of the answer to your questions. It is time that government of the people, for the people, and by the people stopped being just empty promises.

The fact of the matter is, to repeat my first simpler sentence, cannabis has no place on the illegal drug list.

It is there, however.

I'm here—today—to say—out loud—in public—that I acknowledge that Cannabis should NOT be illegal, that the prohibition against it is even more wrong-headed than the prohibition against alcohol, as it is far less harmful than alcohol, and with far more medical benefits. And, unlike alcohol, no one has ever died from smoking too much marijuana, but we all know how many have died from drinking too much alcohol. The only way that marijuana has ever ruined anyone's life is because of the laws against it, not the substance, itself. The only way anyone has ever died because of marijuana is because of the laws against it being enforced by armed government officials, be they DEA, FBI, or local police, not the use of the substance, itself. Even the AMA is calling to have it removed from its current place as a Class 1 drug! Many states have passed laws making it legal to use for medical reasons!

I have heard your frustration against the government. I have heard your cry and plea for honesty and transparency.

I am here, today, though, to finally be honest and transparent, even if the government as a whole, is not. On just one small subject, mind you, but I have to start somewhere, and I might as well start here. If you aren't completely out of touch with the media, you know by now that not only have I, personally, smoked marijuana, I even joked about the subject in a public speech to make Bill Clinton look backwards by claiming he didn't inhale when he tried smoking marijuana. Yes, I inhaled, that's the point, is what I am quoted as saying. Therefore I know, personally, that it is not harmful, let alone dangerous. I know it can be just a pleasant way to relax with friends, like drinking a beer or two at the local hangout.

However, I cannot personally force the DEA to remove Cannabis from the Class 1 drug schedule list.

I can, however, personally admonish them for the perpetuation of a lie in a very long lies on the subject of marijuana, a lie that harms hundreds and thousands of American citizens. It harms whole families. It harms good, decent, hard-working people who indulged in something even less harmful than a few beers after work. It harms the victims of the United States' illegitimate marijuana laws by turning good, decent people into criminals for the consumption of a plant that people have been using with little to no harm to themselves, or any others, for tens of thousands of years. It harms these innocent victims by keeping an inexpensive, safe, and effective drug out of the hands of hundreds of thousands of sick people who would benefit greatly by its use, not to mention the thousands of farmers who could be raising hemp for paper, fiber, fabric, and many dozens of other ways in an environmentally responsible way, employing thousands of Americans in new jobs.

So, one more time.

Cannabis has no place on the illegal drug list.


That's all I have to say.

There will be no questions and answers.

Thank you for your time.


End_of__What_I_Wish_Were_Barack_Obama's_Re-Election Speech_

p.s. (This speech isn't being written pro bono, it's being written on the contingency that you actually give the speech!)

p.p.s. anyone not believing my facts as presented is respectfully directed to Google search, where you can do your own research!

p.p.s. obviously, I'm not a professional speech writer, so I apologize for any shortcomings in that regard. I'm sure a professional could polish it up and it would really be excellent, while keeping all the original facts and intent intact.
 
+Richard Harwood: So, I guess I'm left wondering why you would like to spend good money when we're already spending a lot of money on something that has been demonstrated not to work instead of removing the motive?
 
Dear Mr. President,

you have done nothing that you have said you would do... you've turned your back on what matters the most and you have RAISED the national debt instead of lowering it You have made healthcare nothing, you have not even adopted clean energy laws... you claim to be the least bad scoundrel on the list... but you are really at the apex of the totem pole, and that was NOT a compliment to you. You are probably one of the most hated people in the USA... If you get re-elected... I'm going to Canada...

You have turned your back on the people, and they will surely turn their backs on you if they have any idea the kinds of ungodly things that you support. You support babies being killed, you allow marriages that are immoral, and you want to pull the troops out of Iraq... the last one would be the biggest mistake you can make... if you pull out of Iraq, then there will be another 9/11 believe me. Your little reign of lies will end in 2012, or there will be a World War 3.

I have dragged this on long enough, so I'll let you get back to the duties that you perform... whatever those are...

Signed,

Charles R. Satterfield
 
I will vote for you if you do the things mentioned above ----^
 
+Charles Satterfield: Way to ignore the two wars handed off and a boondoggle of a bank bailout Bush passed on his way out the door. You got played by the Republicans bro.
 
shock...the president?
 
While your at it could you legalize cocaine, heroin, meth, soap salts and all street drugs. That way the addicts won't have to pay so much for them. That will lower crime. Plus, with easy access addicts will die off sooner and save everyone a lot of trouble
 
Paul: time is money right. so how quick can you make 12,000,000 jobs this month ? threaten to jail any person illegally in this country after 30 days starting NOW. how do you like that no cost removal.
 
who is this Registered I need to get
 
I voted Ron Paul in Illinois Primary, if he doesn't get the presidential bid. I will be happy to vote Obama back in office.
 
+David Corbett: So we're just going to ignore that it takes time to end a war, much less the two Bush started?
 
Obama needs to retire. I'm voting for Boom Boom
Translate
 
Get registered, go out and vote, why don't you aholes do something for a change.
 
the world is changing and always~
 
I invite Obama to register on weibo.com! Welcome! — From a Chinese citizen!
 
当然,中国民众与中国共产党是不一样的,但是你提供留学、移民申请时作区分了吗?!我相信你能看到国际新闻,看看前些天新加坡发生了什么就知道了!你也不想中国的红色移民(共产党背景)、新移民(中国暴发户),损害到美国!(甚至是美国人民的生命、财产安全吧!!!!!!!!) ………………
Translate
王野
 
奥哥楼下全是同胞啊?!
Translate
Translate
 
什么情况不占领奥巴马了
Translate
 
这条还没到500,你们这群战斗力只有5的渣渣们
Translate
唐静
 
凑个热闹
Translate
 
i hate you illuminate!! :P
 
go fuck with extraterrestrials haha
 
奥巴马根本不适合当总统。美国没落了。
Translate
 
赶紧下台吧,你在位所有魔鬼都蠢蠢欲动!
Translate
 
=-= 小心查水表
 
Respected sir ,.Rights over people rule not for animal.Think human community.register under world unity of culture.Right to know. Vikram Itagi India.Karnatak
罗吉
 
好久没来看你了…
Translate
 
这不科学,这还没到500条
 
Not with a ten foot pole, Sir.
韩雪
 
观海,喜欢你的博客
all american friends,i hope you can vote to obama.i don't ilke the others
 
马哥 你还能当总统吗?
Translate
 
我是不会投票的
Translate
Yi QI
 
I do think these words are not true somewhere.
 
why I can't open Facebook and Twitter!!!
 
我擦!!!居然还有位子?!第一次离小马哥这么近啊!膜拜ing...希望小马哥速度收复菲律宾!!!
Translate
 
If i could vote this year, i would vote for you.
 
Do not challenge China's sovereignty,Huangyan Island is China's。
 
巴马兄,我求绿k
Translate
 
Yes remember the two parties that got us here and make sure you don't vote for them in November. We have to get rid of the ones that caused the problems before we can fix the problem.
 
Go Barack...Gonna work them polls this year as I done 4 years ago. Love you and Michelle.....
 
i'm sure acorn and the others are out at the graveyards now getting names.
 
suport Obama,even thought there are many tings he did not deal well.
but he can argue with our goverment . present china get strong is not good for world, we must try to make it good before we china become more democratic . it is good for china and american and the world.
 
Democracy should dominate the whole world considering peace and existence of human beings
 
whats du diff. between U & Osama Obama
zhu guo
 
no pays no gays
Translate
 
奥巴马,你当最强大国家的总统太软弱了!要有布什的气概!
Translate
 
好啊好啊,大家投我票啊,我要当总统啦,啦啦啦!
Translate
 
우리의 대통령은 그 편이 크래커의 나머지를 위해 몇 가지 고전 고대를 읽어야
Translate
朱宏
 
奥巴毛同志!
Translate
 
WE NEED A NEW PRESIDENT. SORRY BUT U LIED TO US.YOU ARE A BAD EXAMPLE TO MY DAUGHTER AS I DO TEACH HER TO BE HONEST WITH THE REAL TRUTH. YOU LIED WHEN YOU MADE PROMISE AFTER PROMISE SO YOU COULD GET INTO OFFICE AND ONCE YOU WERE IN YOU SCREWED THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, WITH THE WORST RESECCION SINCE THE DEPRESSION.  SHAME ON YOU FOR TEACHING OUR YOUTH AND CHILDREN THAT IT IS OK TO LIE AS LONG AS YOU GET WHERE YOU WANT TO BE. YOU SHOULD SET THE EXAMPLE AND DEMONSTRATE BETTER MORALS AND VALUES AS THE PRESIDENT OF THIS GREAT COUNTRY.
 
every legal American should vote. America please get all the facts before you vote for the great american hater. obama is his name. 
 
Dear MR. President you're my role model hope you get this message. I want to be the next neurologist surgeon and on the side I want to study a cure for cancer. This might be out of topic but i wanted you to that the future is coming our way. Bless you President Barack Obama   a president you will remember for a lifetime
Ting He
+
1
2
1
 
评论一条不容易阿 奥巴马奥巴马奥巴马奥巴马奥巴马。。。
Translate
 
And register your dog too! Ever wonder why Obama, Holder and the DOJ dont pursue voter intimidation cases against non-minorities?
 
supply tool steel/alloy steel/mould steel
 
dios permita señor Presidente  su triunfo en las proximas elecciones felicidades
Translate
 
你们还要被共匪的宣传机构骗多久?你们还要被共匪的宣传机构骗多久?你们还要被共匪的宣传机构骗多久?你们还要被共匪的宣传机构骗多久?你们还要被共匪的 宣传机构骗多久?你们还要被共匪的宣传机构骗多久?你们还要被共匪的宣传机构骗多久?你们还要被共匪的宣传机构骗多久?你们还要被共匪的宣传机构骗多久? 你们还要被共匪的宣传机构骗多久?你们还要被共匪的宣传机构骗多久?你们还要被共匪的宣传机构骗多久?你们还要被共匪的宣传机构骗多久?你们还要被共匪的 宣传机构骗多久?你们还要被共匪的宣传机构骗多久?你们还要被共匪的宣传机构骗多久?你们还要被共匪的宣传机构骗多久?
Translate
 
Yes!!! I totally agree... that's why we got to get the Obama truth out there for everyone to hear!!!  Only then can we save our republic.  Spread the word, No-bama in 2012!!!
 
jimmy put obama in ur shoes, if u are in that position some people will hold ur hands some will be given u sopport pls did u no politics, we've learn from here many happens NG? pls give sopport.
 
yeah jimmy dont be a jerk
 
Fact: In June according to BLS there was 142415k people employed in the United States. July: 142220k - a decline of 195k
 
Obama you are a socialist and you belong in a third world country NOT OURS. I hope and pray you lose. You have a dirty campaign and lie lie lie.
 
tsk tsk I pity the victims of propaganda. A lot of government programs are socialist in nature. Social Security for example. By itself, socialism is not wrong when it serves the good of the people. Unless, you want to put your money where your mouth is and abdicate your inclusion to all Social Security benefits, along with all "socialist" programs you are likely benefiting from right now. You lie to yourselves, and shame on you for involving God or whatever deity you happen to worship by praying while looking through narrow slits of your prejudice. Your enemies are His children too, and God is likely not a partisan to any political belief. How selfish people are. Seriously, it's not so much that you hate Obama, you just hate this America where people like you aren't on top, and I think that not having ignorance at the top is a very good thing.
 
Take Romney and Ryan to a tea party and let them sip tea and let the real men do the the job! OBAMA / BIDEN 2012
Add a comment...