This is how search should be - it should reflect how human mind associates and connects entities, the only difference is here we have infinite memory and precise connections. This is by all means a trendsetting move - thanks for the upgrade.
Can anyone please explain me the URL - .../introducing-knowledge-graph-things-not.html ..... what's the role of "-things-not" there? I understand posts from Google needn't have the URL optimized ;) but I am definitely interested to understand this further.
I am wondering if you would give us your comments on this post? "Google Just Hi-jacked the Semantic Web Vocabulary" http://bit.ly/JDsjgD Of course, we're not saying we aren't excited for what Google is doing to improve search.
Amit, can you tell us if Google is going to allow the general public to contribute to Google's Knowledge Graph? For example, what if people have information about relationships between products available for sale that isn't online at the moment?