I've written a post about the cool stuff that's coming up in the next GNOME release. Check it out!
33 plus ones
Shared publicly•View activity
View 10 previous comments
- 1 hour is pretty impressiveFeb 28, 2012
- some of the GNOME documenters were using the Mageia betas when working on GNOME 3.4 documentation. Thanks for your work on GNOME in Mageia.Feb 28, 2012
- - further to 's comment, Mageia's 3.4 was as steady as a rock throughout the hackfest while openSUSE was unbootable for a couple of days (admittedly only for people insisting on updating constantly).Feb 28, 2012
- I would testify to whatsaid about Mageia. I was positively surprised to see how fast Boxes was packaged for Mageia.Feb 28, 2012
- gnome.org is often reliable anyway. Also, I don't do stable->unstable upgrades (initial change from GNOME 3.2 -> 3.3 is more manual on purpose). This is partly helped because Mageia packages libraries by their major version (e.g. lib64jpeg8-1.2.0-3.mga2 has /usr/lib64/libjpeg.so.8). We can package a "libjpeg" with a new major (e.g. 9) and then gradually recompile things against the new libjpeg. Until everything is recompiled, both libjpeg packages are on the mirrors. There are also checks in place to ensure things get recompiled.: IMO, a lot of the packaging is somewhat boring. You just download the new tarball, verify it, increase the number in the spec file, reset the release number to 1, check if patches still apply, then commit all changes and submit the new spec file for building. I've automated that bit (triggered by ftp-release-list). If it builds successfully, it'll be available really quickly for Mageia Cauldron users. I know other distributions have a policy that things should be tested before uploading, but that is what we use Cauldron for. Further, anything on
I'm trying to automate all the boring tasks. E.g. updating buildrequires, removing patches applied upstream, etc (still on the todo though).
Oh, and within Mageia we have maintainers (people responsible), but anyone can commit and submit a package. So if something bad happens, there will be a lot of people who can fix it quickly. There are also lots of people looking at every new package + spec change (very noticeable on the mageia-dev mailing list).Feb 29, 2012
- Problem is that most distros will somehow bastardize the Gnome 3 experience. Best to stick with the techy distros (like arch..) Been running Mint for a while, but sloooow to update and their hybrid approach in 12 didn't go well with me.Mar 19, 2012